Chronic health effects in people exposed to arsenic via the drinking water: dose–response relationships in review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2003.10.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Chronic arsenic (As) poisoning has become a worldwide public health issue. Most human As exposure occurs from consumption of drinking water containing high amounts of inorganic As (iAs). In this paper, epidemiological studies conducted on the dose–response relationships between iAs exposure via the drinking water and related adverse health effects are reviewed. Before the review, the methods for evaluation of the individual As exposure are summarized and classified into two types, that is, the methods depending on As concentration of the drinking water and the methods depending on biological monitoring for As exposure; certain methods may be applied as optimum As exposure indexes to study dose–response relationship based on various As exposure situation. Chronic effects of iAs exposure via drinking water include skin lesions, neurological effects, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, diabetes mellitus, and malignancies including skin cancer. The skin is quite sensitive to arsenic, and skin lesions are some of the most common and earliest nonmalignant effects related to chronic As exposure. The increase of prevalence in the skin lesions has been observed even at the exposure levels in the range of 0.005–0.01 mg/l As in drinking waters. Skin, lung, bladder, kidney, liver, and uterus are considered as sites As-induced malignancies, and the skin is though to be perhaps the most sensitive site. Prospective studies in large area of endemic As poisoning, like Bangladesh or China, where the rate of malignancies is expected to increase within the next several decades, will help to clarify the dose–response relationship between As exposure levels and adverse health effects with enhanced accuracy.

Introduction

Arsenic (As) is a common element and there are several chances in which people are exposed to As in daily life. Occupational As exposures are observed frequently in smelter workers from the inhalation of As fumes, since As is found as sulfide compounds in various ores as ubiquitous contaminant. Lung cancer is well known to result from As exposure in occupational settings. In recent times, As has become an essential component in the production of semiconductor chips. In occupational settings, workers are often monitored for As exposure level by measuring As contents in biological samples, such as hair, urine, or blood, to help reduce exposure before the onset of the overt clinical manifestations of As poisoning Peyster and Silvers, 1995, Yamauchi et al., 1989. Preclinical manifestations of As exposure can be combined with biological monitoring for As exposure, as with workers engaged in semiconductor industries where hair level of As has been evaluated alone with immunological alternations induced by As exposure (Yoshida et al., 1987). The target population of occupational exposure to As differs from that of general population, because occupational exposure subjects are typically healthy adults with a disproportional distribution of males. In addition, there are often coexisting exposures in occupational settings. Thus, it can be difficult to relate the adverse health effects observed in occupationally exposed workers exclusively to As. Inorganic As (iAs) has been used pharmacologically for the treatment of malaria, syphilis, leukemia, or psoriasis under the name of Fowler's solution, etc. Skin lesions, including dermal malignancies, were observed in the patients who were prescribed arsenical medicines. The prevalence of malignancy was correlated with As intake (Cuzick et al., 1992). These various patient populations are similarly not representative of the general population.

Chronic As poisoning in the general population has been widely reported in many areas of the world today. In these situations, As exposure occurs by consumption of drinking water that naturally contains high amount of inorganic forms of As (Smith et al., 2000b). The outbreak of As poisoning in many areas was triggered by the desire to obtain microorganism-free safety drinking water, and often surface water was replaced by underground water obtained by tube wells. Arsenic poisoning via the drinking water affects all the residents who are living in the contaminated field. Thus, accurate evaluation on dose–response relations between As exposure and adverse health effects in a general population could be assessed in the endemic area of high As exposure. The knowledge of dose–response relationships between As exposure and adverse health effects will help in estimation of health risk and prevention of As poisoning in the future among the resident in areas of endemic As poisoning and also among the workers occupationally exposed to As. In this paper, researches conducted on the dose–response relationships between inorganic As (iAs) exposure via the drinking water and adverse health effects are reviewed.

Section snippets

Index of arsenic exposure

Before discussing of dose–response relationship, the methods for evaluation of individual As exposure need to be described. Two major approaches have been used for evaluation of As exposure, as summarized below. Each method has advantages and disadvantages. Thus, it is necessary to observe the situation and to employ the optimum index based on the target symptoms or the health effects.

Dose–response relationship between arsenic exposure and arsenic-related chronic health effects

The chronic health effects of iAs exposure from consumption of As-contaminated water include skin lesions, skin cancer, internal malignancies, neurological effects, hypertension, peripheral vascular diseases, cardiovascular disease, respiratory diseases, and diabetes mellitus (Smith et al., 2000b). Skin lesions are one of the most common features of chronic As poisoning and these lesions are used as a diagnostic criteria of endemic As poisoning in Inner Mongolia, China (Guo et al., 2001). There

Discussion

Many epidemiological studies on As poisoning due to consumption of As-contaminated water have been reported worldwide. On the other hand, there are relatively few reports concerning dose–response relationships between As exposure and As-related adverse health effects, because it is often difficult to evaluate individual As exposure. It is critical to evaluate As exposure in studies on the chronic toxic effects of As, especially with regard to the estimation of cancer risk.

Arsenic poisoning from

References (28)

  • C Hopenhayn-Rich et al.

    Lung and kidney cancer mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Cordoba, Argentina

    Int. J. Epidemiol.

    (1998)
  • P Kurttio et al.

    Arsenic concentrations in well water and risk of bladder and kidney cancer in Finland

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (1999)
  • D.N.G Mazumder et al.

    Arsenic levels in drinking water and the prevalence of skin lesions in West Bengal, India

    Int. Epidemiol. Assoc.

    (1998)
  • D.N.G Mazumder et al.

    Arsenic levels in drinking water and the prevalence of respiratory effects in West Bengal, India

    Int. Epidemiol. Assoc.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text