Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 120, Issue 7, July 2013, Pages 1432-1439
Ophthalmology

Original article
Ophthalmic Evaluations in Clinical Studies of Fingolimod (FTY720) in Multiple Sclerosis

Poster presented at: the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, October 23, 2011, Orlando, Florida.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.12.040Get rights and content

Purpose

To report outcomes of ophthalmic evaluations in clinical studies of patients receiving fingolimod (Gilenya; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) for multiple sclerosis (MS).

Design

Analysis done on pooled safety data (N = 2615, all studies group) from 3 double-masked, randomized, parallel-group clinical trials (phase 2 core and extension >5 years, and phase 3 FREEDOMS and TRANSFORMS core and extension studies).

Participants

Patients aged 18 to 55 years (18–60 years in phase 2 study) diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS were included. Patients with diabetes mellitus or macular edema (ME) at screening were excluded.

Intervention

Participants received fingolimod (0.5/1.25 mg), placebo, or interferon beta for the respective study durations. Ophthalmic examination included detailed eye history (at screening), visual acuity (VA) assessment, dilated ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography (FA).

Main Outcome Measures

Extensive ophthalmic monitoring was performed for all patients. While being studied, patients with abnormal findings on dilated ophthalmoscopy and OCT compatible with ME were further studied by FA. All locally diagnosed ME cases were centrally reviewed by the retina specialist (M.A.Z.) on the Data and Safety Monitoring Board.

Results

Among 2615 patients assessed, 19 confirmed ME cases were observed in fingolimod-treated groups (0.5 mg: n = 4, 0.3%; 1.25 mg: n = 15, 1.2%). Most patients (n = 13, 68%) presented with blurred vision, decreased VA, or eye pain. Macular edema was diagnosed within 3 to 4 months of treatment initiation in most cases (n = 13, 68%); 2 patients had late onset (>12 months) ME. Of the 19 patients with ME, 5 (26%), all treated with fingolimod 1.25 mg, had a history of uveitis compared with 26 (1%) in the all studies group. In most cases (n = 16, 84%), ME resolved after discontinuing the study drug. Eleven patients required topical anti-inflammatory medications. No patient had further vision deterioration.

Conclusions

Fingolimod 0.5 mg is associated with a low incidence of ME in MS studies. Patients with a history of uveitis may be at an increased risk of developing ME. An ophthalmic examination before initiating fingolimod therapy and regular follow-up eye examinations during fingolimod therapy are recommended.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Section snippets

Study Population

Analyses were based on pooled data from the phase 2 and 3 core and extension studies for MS (N = 2615, “all studies group” safety population, patients who received at least 1 dose of fingolimod). The phase 2 core study (FTY720D2201) of 6 months' duration was a double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study9 and had an optional long-term extension phase10 of more than 5 years. FREEDOMS5 (FTY720D2301; FTY720 Research Evaluating Effects of Daily Oral therapy in Multiple Sclerosis) was a

Results

Patient disposition and incidence of ME in the MS clinical studies of fingolimod are shown in Figure 2 (available at http://aaojournal.org).

Among 2615 patients of the all studies group safety population assessed in this pooled analysis, 19 cases of ME were confirmed by the retina specialist on the DSMB. Among 1176 patients who received fingolimod 0.5 mg, 4 (0.3%) developed ME, and among the 1302 patients who received fingolimod 1.25 mg, 15 (1.2%) developed ME. Macular edema occurred in both

Discussion

Macular edema is an important cause of central vision loss and is associated with a serious impact on the social and economic aspects of an individual's life.11 Beyond the direct impact on vision, and thus disability, it has also been found that patients with MS and ME can have significantly worse disability (as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale12) and rate of disease progression (as measured by the MS Severity Scale13) than those without ME.14 The cause and pathophysiology of ME

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Uma Kundu and Hashem Salloukh (Medical Communications, Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.) for providing medical writing support. This encompassed preparing the first draft, checking content and language, formatting, referencing, preparing tables and figures, incorporating the authors' revisions, and submission, all under the direction of the authors.

References (35)

  • H. Tedesco-Silva et al.

    Randomized controlled trial of FTY720 versus MMF in de novo renal transplantation

    Transplantation

    (2006)
  • K. Budde et al.

    FTY720 (fingolimod) in renal transplantation

    Clin Transplant

    (2006)
  • L. Kappos et al.

    Oral fingolimod (FTY720) for relapsing multiple sclerosis

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • P. O'Connor et al.

    Oral fingolimod (FTY720) in multiple sclerosis: two-year results of a phase II extension study

    Neurology

    (2009)
  • V. Biousse et al.

    Multiple sclerosis associated with uveitis in two large clinic-based series

    Neurology

    (1999)
  • J.F. Kurtzke

    Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

    Neurology

    (1983)
  • R.H. Roxburgh et al.

    Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score: using disability and disease duration to rate disease severity

    Neurology

    (2005)
  • Cited by (112)

    • Updates on sphingolipids: Spotlight on retinopathy

      2021, Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Manuscript no. 2012-873.

    Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have made the following disclosure(s): M.A.Z. is a consultant for Novartis Pharma AG (Basel, Switzerland); L.M.J. was a former consultant for Novartis Pharma AG (Basel, Switzerland); R.D.J. is a consultant for Novartis Pharma AG (Basel, Switzerland); A.T.R. is a consultant for Novartis Pharma AG (Basel, Switzerland); G.F. is a full-time employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (East Hanover, NJ); W.C. is a full-time employee of Novartis Pharma AG (Basel, Switzerland); D.T. is a full-time employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (East Hanover, NJ); and X.J. is a full-time employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (East Hanover, NJ). At all stages the authors have had control over the content of this manuscript, for which they have given final approval and take full responsibility. Novartis Pharma AG enforces a “no ghostwriting” policy. As funding sponsors, they have had the opportunity to review the manuscript but do not have the authority to change any aspect of the manuscript.

    Funding: The studies were funded by Novartis Pharma AG (Basel, Switzerland) and are registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (Phase 2 core: NCT00333138; Phase 2 extension study: NCT00235430; FREEDOMS and extension study: NCT00289978; TRANSFORMS and extension study: NCT00340834). The sponsor participated in the design of the study, conducting the study, data collection, data management, and data analysis, interpretation of the data, preparation, and review and approval of the manuscript. Supported in part by unrestricted grants from the Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. (New Jersey Medical School, Northwestern University), the Eye Institute of New Jersey, and the NJ Lions Eye Research Foundation.

    View full text