Original article
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion of Hickman lines in children. Prospective study of 500 consecutive procedures

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.12.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Aim

The ultrasound-guided percutaneous technique of Hickman line insertion has not been widely adopted in pediatric surgical practice. We wished to review our own experience of using this technique for insertion into the internal jugular vein.

Methods

Our vascular access team consists of a consultant surgeon and 2 consultant anesthetists. All procedures were prospectively recorded on a database and were either performed or directly supervised by our team.

Results

Five hundred consecutive Hickman lines were inserted between June 2004 and October 2006. Patients' ages ranged from 14 days to 19 years (median, 44 months). Patients weighed between 600 g to more than 100 kg. Lines inserted were all tunneled silicone Hickman lines with a Dacron cuff (size 2.7F-10F, with 1-3 lumens), of which 60% were 7F double-lumen lines. Successful cannulation occurred in 99.8%. Perioperative complications (within 30 days) occurred in 12 patients (2.4%) and were all treated conservatively with no need for either blood transfusion or chest drain. Catheter-related sepsis rate was 3.16 per 1000 line days.

Discussion

  • 1.

    The technique of ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion of Hickman line to the internal jugular vein is safe and is applicable to all children regardless of size, age, or diagnosis.

  • 2.

    Pediatric surgeons and anesthetists can learn this technique without specific training in interventional radiology.

  • 3.

    A learning curve does exist, and we recommend concentrating pediatric vascular access procedures to a specialist team.

Section snippets

Methods

All patients requiring a Hickman line insertion were suitable for the technique of ultrasound-guided percutaneous approach regardless of size, age, weight, and clinical diagnosis and were referred directly to the vascular access service. Our vascular access team consists of a consultant surgeon (GSA) and 2 consultant anesthetists (JB and PB) and aims to provide a range of permanent central venous access devices. Since April 2004, data from all procedures performed by the vascular access team

Technique

The approach we describe is a modification of the standard Seldinger technique. All lines are inserted via the ultrasound-guided percutaneous route using either the internal jugular or innominate veins. Procedures are all done under general anesthetic in the operating theater and involve a separate pediatric anesthetist giving the anesthetic. We use a high-resolution ultrasound probe (CL10-5 compact linear array probe) that is covered with a sterile cover.

With the patient supine and a roll

Results

Five hundred consecutive Hickman lines were inserted between June 2004 and October 2006 in 403 patients. Patients had a median age of 44 months (range, 14 days to 19 years); weight ranged from 600 g to more than 100 kg. Indications for line insertion are shown in Table 2. No patient referred to the Vascular Access Service was refused because of size, age, weight, or diagnosis. Lines inserted were all tunneled silicone Hickman lines with a Dacron cuff (size 2.7F-10F with 1-3 lumens), of which

Discussion

Although permanent central vascular access is essential to the function of any major tertiary-level pediatric hospital, there are few studies comparing the various techniques of insertion. Fatalities and failure to cannulate the vein using the traditional LT without ultrasound visualization are well reported [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35]. As a result and although there are no large studies of OSC for direct comparison, many UK pediatric

References (44)

  • GaudererM.W. et al.

    Broviac silastic catheter insertion in children: a simplified direct subclavian approach

    J Pediatr Surg

    (1982)
  • BagwellC.E. et al.

    Potentially lethal complications of central venous catheter placement

    J Pediatr Surg

    (2000)
  • WarnerB.W. et al.

    Multiple purpose central venous access in infants less than 1,000 grams

    J Pediatr Surg

    (1987)
  • LoeffD.S. et al.

    Insertion of a small central venous catheter in neonates and young infants

    J Pediatr Surg

    (1982)
  • Goutail-FlaudM.F. et al.

    Central venous catheter-related complications in newborns and infants: a 587-case survey

    J Pediatr Surg

    (1991)
  • SkladalD. et al.

    Complications of percutaneous insertion of Hickman catheters in children

    J Pediatr Surg

    (1999)
  • BroviacJ.W. et al.

    A silicone rubber atrial catheter for prolonged parenteral alimentation

    Surg Gynecol Obstet

    (1973)
  • HickmanR.O. et al.

    A modified right atrial catheter for access to the venous system in marrow transplant recipients

    Surg Gynecol Obstet

    (1979)
  • HeimbachD.M. et al.

    Technique for placement of a permanent home hyperalimentation catheter

    Surg Gynecol Obstet

    (1976)
  • BarnacleA.M. et al.

    Internal jugular vein patency rates following tunnelled central venous access by open surgical and ultrasound guided percutaneous techniques

  • MaleC. et al.

    Significant association with location of central venous line placement and risk of venous thrombosis in children

    Thromb Haemost

    (2005)
  • KorogluM. et al.

    Percutaneous placement of central venous catheters: comparing the anatomical landmark method with the radiologically guided technique for central venous catheterization through the internal jugular vein in emergent hemodialysis patients

    Acta Radiologica

    (2006)
  • Cited by (64)

    • Ultrasound guidance for Port-A-Cath insertion in children; a comparative study

      2021, International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      These results are consistent with other studies that reported 0.4–2.8% chest tube insertion after central line placement. In a study by Arul and coworkers on 500 pediatric patients, no pneumothoraces were reported [5]. Our results showed a higher insertion complication rate with the landmark technique (P = .052).

    • Open Versus Ultrasound Guided Tunneled Central Venous Access in children: A Randomized Controlled Study

      2021, Journal of Surgical Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      This study demonstrated ultrasound guided percutaneous insertion was safe, resulted in shorter operating times, no increased risk of complication rates, and preservation of vessel size. While ultrasound guided percutaneous access has been compared and proven to be safer than blind punctures,2 it has not been compared with open surgical access. Ours is the first randomized trial comparing open versus ultrasound guided percutaneous catheter insertion in children.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Interest declared: Our Hickman lines are all (except 2.7F) supplied by Bard Access Systems, Salt Lake City, UT, which financially supports vascular access educational events in which the authors participate. Our 2.7F lines are supplied by Vygon Ltd, Ecouen, France. Other manufacturers make similar products. Neither of our suppliers has in any way influenced the content of this paper, nor have the authors received any incentive to endorse a particular product or technique.

    View full text