Original article
General thoracic
Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum: A Comparative Study and Review of the Literature

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.067Get rights and content

Background

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (SPM) is an unusual occurrence with few cases reported. It is seen after intrathoracic pressure changes leading to alveolar rupture and dissection of air along the tracheobronchial tree. This study was undertaken to provide a thorough clinical and radiologic analysis of this patient population.

Methods

A retrospective comparative analysis was performed on patients with SPM over 12 years. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, and radiographic and diagnostic studies were recorded. A clinical and radiologic comparison was performed with secondary pneumomediastinum.

Results

Seventy-four patients were identified with a diagnosis of pneumomediastinum. A total of 28 patients with SPM were identified. The major initial complaints were chest pain (54%), shortness of breath (39%), and subcutaneous emphysema (32%). The main triggering events were emesis (36%) and asthma flare-ups (21%). No apparent triggering event was noted in 21% of patients. Chest radiograph was diagnostic in 69%; computed tomography was required in 31%. Esophagram, esophagoscopy, and bronchoscopy were performed on an individual basis and were invariably negative. When compared with secondary pneumomediastinum, SPM is more likely to be discovered by chest radiography, has a lower incidence of pneumothorax and pleural effusion, requires a shorter hospital stay, and has no associated mortality.

Conclusions

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum is a benign condition that often presents with chest pain or dyspnea. It can develop without a triggering event and with no findings on chest radiography. Treatment is expectant and recurrence is low. Secondary causes must be ruled out to avoid an unfavorable outcome.

Section snippets

Material and Methods

A retrospective comparative study of the cases of spontaneous pneumomediastinum diagnosed over a 12-year period is presented. Patients with SPM and a cohort of patients presenting with secondary pneumomediastinum during the same time frame were compared. Approval to conduct this retrospective study was granted by the Baptist Memorial Hospital and University of Tennessee (UT) Institutional Review Boards, and individual patient consent was waived. Data collection was performed following strict

Results

A total of 74 patients were identified with mediastinal emphysema or pneumomediastinum. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria previously defined, SPM was identified in 28 patients. The average age was 27 ± 17 years with a range from 3 to 71. Fifty-seven percent (16 of 28) were male.

The most frequently reported symptom was chest pain in 54% (15 of 28), followed by dyspnea in 39% (11 of 28) and cough in 32% (9 of 28). Relevant findings on physical examination included subcutaneous

Comment

Pneumomediastinum is viewed by the medical community as an ominous sign with potentially devastating complications. The differential diagnosis for chest pain, dyspnea, or subcutaneous emphysema focuses on cardiac or pulmonary sources, including acute coronary events, pericarditis, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, and pneumothorax. Esophageal perforation, spasm, and reflux disease are also included in the differential diagnosis. Once these etiologic factors are excluded, a high degree of suspicion

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text