The value of plain film findings in hydatid disease of bone
References (15)
- et al.
Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in spinal hydatidosis
Surgery and Neurology
(1987) - et al.
Hydatid disease of bone in Australasia
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
(1964) - et al.
Osseous hydatidosis
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
(1978) - et al.
Hydatid disease in Kuwait
British Medical Journal
(1962) The management of hydatid disease
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
(1972)- et al.
Pathology in the tropics
- et al.
Vertebral hydatid disease: clinical experience with 27 cases
Journal of Neurosurgery
(1976)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (47)
Solitary hydatid cyst in the forearm: A case report
2018, International Journal of Surgery Case ReportsCitation Excerpt :A diagnosis cannot be obtained only by clinical presentation and further tools are needed to confirm the diagnosis. These include plain radiographs, taking into consideration that only 38% of patients will show soft tissue masses and calcification via plain radiography [15,16]. Ultrasonography is considered the gold standard and magnetic resonance imaging is more valuable in terms of confirming the diagnosis.
Humeral hydatid cyst mimicking a malignant bone tumor
2005, European Journal of Radiology ExtraPrimary Tumors of the Sacrum: Imaging Findings
2022, Current Medical ImagingA rare lesion that mimics a bone tumor: Osseous hydatidosis
2022, Joint Diseases and Related SurgeryMultimodality imaging in a patient with hydatid disease of the pelvic bone
2020, BMJ Case ReportsA Rare Presentation of Hydatid Cyst: A Case with Radial Bone Involvement
2020, Turkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi
Copyright © 1993 Published by Elsevier Ltd.