Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sensitivity of Upper Endoscopy in Diagnosing Esophageal Cancer

  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is a common cause of dysphagia and upper endoscopy is the accepted standard for making the diagnosis; however, the accuracy of endoscopy is not known. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity of upper endoscopy in making the diagnosis of esophageal cancer in clinical practice. All patients with a new diagnosis of esophageal cancer from 1997 to 2001 in the Tumor Registry of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center were identified. The medical records were reviewed to identify all patients who had undergone a previous endoscopy within two years that failed to diagnose esophageal cancer. The reason for failure was recorded. One hundred ten new cases of esophageal carcinoma were identified, and ten patients had had a previous false-negative endoscopy within two years for a sensitivity of 90.9% in clinical practice. The reasons for the failure of endoscopy were (1) lesion not seen in seven patients, (2) lesion seen and biopsied with benign histology in two patients, and (3) lesion seen but felt to be benign and not biopsied in one patient. Given the uncertain natural history of esophageal cancer, the data were also analyzed using a one-year window; this resulted in a sensitivity of 94.5%. The sensitivity of upper endoscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer in general clinical practice is 90.9% using a two-year window and 94.5% using a one-year window. Understanding the reasons for the failure of endoscopy may allow us to improve the practice of endoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 53:5–26, 2003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lambert R: Diagnosis of esophagogastric tumors. Endoscopy 34:129–138, 2002

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shaheen NJ, Provenzale D, Sandler RS: Upper endoscopy as a screening and surveillance tool in esophageal adenocarcinoma: a review of the evidence. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1319–1327, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. El Serag HB, Mason AC, Petersen N, Key CR: Epidemiological differences between adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia in the USA. Gut 50:368–372, 2002

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pottern LM, Morris LE, Blot WJ, Ziegler RG, Fraumeni JF: Esophageal cancer among black men in Washington, D.C. I. Alcohol, tobacco, and other risk factors. J Natl Cancer Inst 67:777–783, 1981

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH, Lemmel GT, Kaster S, Buckley JS: Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 112:17–23, 1997

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hosokawa O, Tsuda S, Kidani E, Watanabe K, Tanigawa Y, Shirasaki S, et al.: Diagnosis of gastric cancer up to three years after negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 30:669–674, 1998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lambert R, Rey JF: Endoscopy and early neoplasia: better but not the best. Endoscopy 33:348–352, 2001

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Younes M, Henson DE, Ertan A, Miller CC: Incidence and survival trends of esophageal carcinoma in the United States: Racial and gender differences by histological type. Scand J Gastroenterol 12:1359–1365, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  10. Graham DY, Schwartz JT, Cain GD, Gyorkey F: Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology 82:228–231, 1982

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard S. Bloomfeld MD.

Additional information

Portions of this work were presented at the 67th annual meeting of The American College of Gastroenterology, Seattle, Washington, October 2002.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bloomfeld, R.S., Bridgers, D.I. & Pineau, B.C. Sensitivity of Upper Endoscopy in Diagnosing Esophageal Cancer. Dysphagia 20, 278–282 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-005-0025-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-005-0025-x

Keywords

Navigation