Visitation to hospital suspended, replaced with virtual contact using iPad | Unable to involve family/carer in rehabilitation process Fewer family meetings with carer and wider family therefore less opportunity to provide education and support around adjustment to life after stroke
| |
Restrictions on community staff accessing hospital wards | | |
Use of PPE—facemasks and visors | | Increased burden on partner to be involved in multidisciplinary rehabilitation as she was not required to wear a mask in the home Increased frustrations when the patient was unable to understand therapists
|
Community clinic spaces closed | | Patient was limited to home environment but due to progressing quickly wanted to increase the intensity and difficulty of his rehabilitation. Being unable to do this increased his frustration and impacted his mood Increased carer stress supporting patient with low mood, unable to have breaks for self-care
|
Local lockdowns and public health restrictions closing local community resources | No access to local facilities and groups to support discharge planning which increased length of stay Unable to practice functional and higher-level tasks outside of home environment Increased requirement for team to support patient and carer as wider family not able to visit during lockdowns
| Unable to access local groups (patient and carer groups) for peer and carer support Unable to practice speech strategies outside of therapists and partner Unable to access personal assistant support through social services at start of rehabilitation, increased carer stress/burden
|
Virtual support groups | | Patient mostly excluded from these groups due to communication impairment Neither patient nor carer use technology so could not see the value in accessing these groups. Eliminated valuable peer support
|