Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Bilateral submandibular gland nodular oncocytic hyperplasia with papillary cystadenoma-like areas
  1. Miles Bannister1,
  2. Christopher S G Thompson2,
  3. Brendan Conn3
  1. 1Department of ENT, NHS Lothian, Livingston, UK
  2. 2Anatomy, Division of Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  3. 3Department of Pathology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
  1. Correspondence to Christopher S G Thompson, christhompson3{at}nhs.net

Summary

A 57-year-old man presented in 2016 with a 4-month history of a right submandibular mass, having undergone left submandibular gland (SMG) excision in 2003. Imaging suggested a benign tumour and subsequent core biopsy findings suggested a nodular oncocytic hyperplasia, similar to the tumour removed from the contralateral side. This was confirmed on histological analysis following right submandibular gland excision which showed characteristic features of nodular oncocytic hyperplasia along with an unusual diffuse papillary cystadenoma-like ductal proliferation, similar to that seen in the 2003 specimen. A diagnosis of multinodular adenomatous oncocytic hyperplasia (MAOH) was rendered in order to communicate the unique histological features that have otherwise not been described in the literature. We believe that this is the first reported case of non-synchronous multinodular oncocytic hyperplasia and the first case affecting the submandibular glands.

  • ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology
  • head and neck surgery
  • otolaryngology / ent

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors Case Identification: MB, CSGT, BC. Histological images: BC. Case report: MB, CSGT, BC. Proofreading: MB, CSGT, BC.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.