Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Breast cancer and organising pneumonia: the importance of correlating the pathological findings with the clinical and radiological picture
  1. Paul Griffiths1,
  2. Helen Doran2,
  3. Duncan Fullerton1
  1. 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Crewe, UK
  2. 2Department of Pathology, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Paul Griffiths, paul_griffiths{at}live.com

Summary

This case describes a female patient with a history of breast cancer who presented with a persistent cough and weight loss after a 17-year disease-free period. Radiologically there were new bilateral intrapulmonary nodules and areas of consolidation with a broad differential diagnosis. Brushings gained via bronchoscopy were suggestive of malignancy, but subsequent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery wedge resection demonstrated organising pneumonia (OP) with no evidence of malignancy. Diagnostic uncertainty remained after this, and after a period of observation, there was evidence of disease progression. Further tissue was obtained for cytological and histological assessment which provided conclusive evidence of metastatic breast cancer. In this case, OP was secondary to proximal bronchial obstruction due to metastatic infiltration, of which there are no reported similar cases in the current literature. We discuss the importance of differentiating secondary OP from cryptogenic OP.

  • respiratory medicine
  • pathology
  • breast cancer
  • oncology
  • interstitial lung disease

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors PG: formulated and wrote the clinical case presentation. HD: contributed the pathology slides and provided pathological descriptions. PG and DF: coauthored the discussion section, with DF providing further revisions to the manuscript. All authors contributed to the editing of the article prior to submission.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.