Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
The changing face of cancer treatments
  1. David Keohane1,
  2. Gerald Paul Fitzgerald2
  1. 1Department of Oncology, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
  2. 2Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Ireland
  1. Correspondence to Dr David Keohane, doctorkeohane{at}gmail.com

Summary

This case demonstrates the effectiveness and ongoing potential of novel lung cancer therapies, specifically immunotherapy agents such as nivolumab, a T-cell programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor inhibitor. In this case study, our patient had a significant burden of disease with nodal involvement above and below the diaphragm at the time of diagnosis. They were commenced on standard of care therapy: cisplatin and pemetrexed. Despite five cycles of treatment with these agents, their disease progressed significantly with the development of brain metastasis. The patient was switched to a novel immunotherapy agent, nivolumab, and had a complete response to it. Currently, there is no active disease—the lymph nodes have all regressed, the brain metastases have disappeared (with the help of stereotactic surgery) and no further metastases have developed. The patient is tolerating the treatment well and has had no significant adverse reactions to the immunotherapy agent.

  • oncology
  • lung cancer (oncology)

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors DK: researched the patient information and produced the first draft. GPF: got consent from the patient and updated the text of the case study.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.