Article Text

Download PDFPDF
A deceptive presentation of Tuberculosis hip as Staphylococcal infection, its successful management and literature review
  1. Chetan Muralidhara Rao Dojode1,
  2. George Joseph1,
  3. Nirav N Shah2
  1. 1Furlong Fellow in Arthroplasty & Revision Surgery, Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, West Sussex, UK
  2. 2Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, West Sussex, UK
  1. Correspondence to Chetan Muralidhara Rao Dojode, drchetanmdojode{at}


A 71-year-old man presented with septic arthritis of the hip with an initial culture growth of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) masking the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). Based on joint aspirate culture and sensitivity results, the patient was first diagnosed with MSSA arthritis. He was started on intravenous antibiotics and underwent washout and debridement of hip. During the procedure, the surgeons observed characteristic tubercular changes and samples were sent for tubercular testing. The reports of cultures for acid-fast bacilli and synovial biopsies confirmed our intraoperative suspicion of TB. Antitubercular medication was started and it helped patient to improve quickly. He completed 9 months of tubercular treatment regimen and at completion total hip replacement was offered. At 8-year follow-up, the patient was doing fine with no recurrence of infection in his hip. High index of suspicion for skeletal TB was raised based on clinical and radiological signs especially if there was a delay or absence of response to appropriate therapy.

  • Bone & Joint infection
  • tuberculosis
  • septic arthritis
  • total hip arthroplasty

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Contributors CMRD: data collection, interpretation and writing the article. GJ: data collection. NNS: supervision and final approval. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.