Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Description
Positive cumulative fluid balance caused by excessive fluid administration during the perioperative phase is known as one of the most common clinical complications in post-intensive care unit cardiac surgery patients.1 Mostly, administration of diuretics is initiated to correct the fluid overload. However, there is no clinical parameter showing the changes in the fluid balance, while daily measurements of weight and fluid balance are initiated to help to manage diuretic therapy. Herein, we present a case report, in which we show that sublingual microcirculation monitoring (SMiMo) may provide an additional check on optimal filling status in these patients apart from recording fluid balance and weight control.
A 75-year-old woman with a history of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia diagnosed with aortic valve stenosis was admitted for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Patient was discharged from the intensive care unit with a cumulative positive fluid balance of 1800 cm3 and transferred to the cardiac ward. The patient’s body weight increased after surgery and was followed by a gradual decrease in the subsequent days (preoperative weight: 64.5 kg, 2 days after surgery: 66.7 kg, 3 and 4 days after surgery: 65.2 and 64.7 kg, respectively). Patients with a severe aortic stenosis suffer from left ventricular hypertrophy requiring careful fluid management.
Therefore, the patient received oral administration of 40 mg furosemide and 25 mg spironolactone per day for the following 3 days to correct fluid overload.
Fluid overload and its microcirculatory impact secondary to cardiac surgery was assessed by SMiMo, using incident dark-field imaging (CytoCam-IDF, Braedius, Huizen, The Netherlands). The CytoCam is a handheld microscope emitting green light with a 548 nm wavelength. The green light ensures optimal absorption by oxyhaemoglobin and deoxyhaemoglobin, through which the red blood cells become visible.2
Images were recorded on day 1 (T0) (figure 1) and day 3 (T1) (figure 2) after TAVR, respectively, showing a substantial increase in vessel density. This significant change can be assessed visually at the same anatomical sublingual site. This is the first report showing a visual effect of diuretic therapy on peripheral microcirculation in a fluid overloaded patient. SMiMo allows comparison of both images without offline analysis, which is usually required. In addition, leukocytosis was also observed at both time points. Subsequent decrease in leucocyte count detected in blood samples (16.3×109/L at T0 decreased to 14.5×109/L at T1) could also be observed on CytoCam images at the same microvascular site.
Offline analysis using dedicated software (Automated Vascular Analysis, AVA, Microvision Medical, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)3 showed an increase in microcirculatory density parameters (total vessel density and perfused vessel density). Microcirculatory flow parameters (proportion of perfused vessels and microvascular mean flow index) showed a minor change indicating a stable flow (see legends of figures 1 and 2).
The patient was discharged from the cardiac surgery ward on postoperative day 5 once a normal weight and fluid balance were obtained.
Learning points
Fluid overload is a common complication after cardiac surgery caused by haemodynamic resuscitation performed during the surgical procedure.
Patients with a severe aortic stenosis suffer from left ventricular hypertrophy requiring careful fluid management.
Sublingual microcirculation monitoring may provide an additional check on optimal filling status in critically ill patients apart from recording fluid balance and weight control.
Footnotes
Contributors ZU participated in the design of the case report, data collection (sublingual microcirculation measurements), the Automated Vascular Analysis of the sublingual microcirculation measurements, interpreted, drafted and revised the manuscript. CI and TvG helped to draft and revise the manuscript. BAdM participated in the design of the case report, contributed by providing the facilities and drafted and revised the manuscript.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.