Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Acute myeloid leukaemia masquerading as a primary CNS tumour
  1. Branko Cuglievan1,
  2. Brian A Menegaz2,
  3. Sofia Garces3,
  4. Michael E Rytting1
  1. 1 Department of Pediatric Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
  2. 2 Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
  3. 3 Department of Hematopathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Branko Cuglievan, cuglievan.branko{at}gmail.com

Summary

In children with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), myeloid sarcomas (MS) of the central nervous system (CNS) are rare. Since MS involving the CNS are potentially curable, timely recognition is paramount. Establishing a diagnosis may be problematic as they can easily mimic primary CNS neoplasms. We report the case of a 5-year-old boy with AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22) rearrangement who presented with a massive intracranial MS and rapid clinical deterioration suggestive of a meningioma or a primitive neuroectodermal tumour. The peripheral smear showed blasts with Auer rods. Urgent chemotherapy was started for AML with presumptive CNS MS. The mass resolved with chemotherapy, and treatment was consolidated with radiotherapy. Although exceedingly rare, this case highlights the potential for MS to present similarly to a primary CNS tumour. MS should be part of the differential diagnosis as part of a CNS mass, particularly if the complete blood count is abnormal.

  • neurooncology
  • oncology
  • radiotherapy
  • haematology (incl blood transfusion)

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors BC and BAM drafted the initial manuscript and contributed equally to this work. SG read the pathology slides and obtained the images. MER reviewed and finalised the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained from guardian.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.