Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke in adults with homozygous sickle cell disease
  1. Loubna Majhadi1,
  2. David Calvet2,
  3. Charlotte Rosso3,
  4. Pablo Bartolucci4
  1. 1APHP (Assistance publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Servicede Neurologie, Groupe hospitalier Henri-Mondor Albert Chenevier, Créteil, France, Creteil, France
  2. 2Department of Neurology, Univ Paris 05, Paris, France
  3. 3Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, ÃŽle-de-France, France
  4. 4Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Creteil, ÃŽle-de-France, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr Loubna Majhadi, loubna.majhadi{at}laposte.net

Summary

Stroke is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with homozygous sickle cell disease (SCD). A specific large-vessel vasculopathy is often responsible for both haemorrhagic and ischaemic strokes in patients with SCD. Although intravenous thrombolysis has been considered as a therapeutic option for acute ischaemic strokes in SCD, its use remains debated because of an increased risk of spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage reported in this disease. This risk of haemorrhage is mainly supported by the presence of a Moyamoya syndrome often associated with the specific vasculopathy in patients with homozygous SCD. We report two cases of patients with homozygous SCD treated with intravenous thrombolysis for an acute ischaemic stroke without haemorrhagic transformation. Our cases suggest that reperfusion strategy in acute ischaemic stroke in patients with homozygous SCD can be considered once associated Moyamoya syndrome has been ruled out. An international registry would be of interest as these situations are rare.

  • moyamoya
  • stroke

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors LM wrote the first draft of the manuscript and did the literature review. LM and DC were involved in the selection of the pictures. DC and PB assisted in the production of the report, and the literature review. PB and CR were involved in the care of the patients. All authors contributed to revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.