Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Management of non-syndromic dens evaginatus affecting permanent maxillary central incisors: a systematic review
  1. Violaine Smail-Faugeron1,2,
  2. Julie Picou Rollin1,
  3. Michèle Muller Bolla2,3,
  4. Frederic Courson1,2
  1. 1Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bretonneau, Service d'Odontologie, Paris, France
  2. 2Université Paris Descartes - Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Unité de Recherches Biomatériaux Innovants et Interface EA4462, Montrouge, France
  3. 3Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université Nice - Sophia Antipolis, Pôle odontologie, CHU, Nice, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr Violaine Smail-Faugeron, viosmail{at}orange.fr

Summary

To assess management of non-syndromic dens evaginatus affecting permanent maxillary central incisor, we performed a systematic review and also present a case report. We searched PubMed via MEDLINE and the reference lists of included reports. Eligible studies were any type of clinical studies describing the management of non-syndromic dens evaginatus affecting the crown of a permanent maxillary central incisor. We included 31 studies corresponding to 34 relevant case reports. Therapeutic options were complete reduction of the talon cusp in a single appointment (56%), periodic and gradual reduction of the cusp (26%), abstention (13%) or extraction (5%). We report an 8-year-old girl with unusual two-talon cusp, labial and lingual, on a right maxillary double central incisor. A multidisciplinary approach is key to management of permanent maxillary central incisors affected by coronary anomalies.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors VS-F and JPC contributed to conception and design, acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data. VS-F, MMB and FC involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. VS-F, JPC, MMB and FC provided final approval of the version published, are accountable for the paper and ensure that all questions regarding the accuracy or integrity of the paper are investigated and resolved.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.