Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Diagnosing neurosyphilis: a case of confusion
  1. Josephine Prynn,
  2. Andleeb Hussain,
  3. Andrew Winnett
  1. Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Josephine Prynn, josephineprynn{at}gmail.com

Summary

A Pakistani man aged 60 years presented with personality change, aggression, paranoid delusions and sexual disinhibition while being treated for severe chest sepsis in intensive care. Collateral history confirmed that these personality changes had been developing over the course of the previous 2 years. He was found to have positive syphilis serology during a routine confusion screen, and the possibility of neurosyphilis was raised. Cerebrospinal fluid examination revealed elevated protein but negative syphilis testing. Following multidisciplinary discussion, the decision was made to treat as neurosyphilis, which resulted in a significant improvement in symptoms. The genitourinary department was able to carry out thorough contact tracing. This case demonstrates the importance of including syphilis in a confusion screen as this patient was diagnosed following a low clinical suspicion. It also highlights some potential pitfalls and difficulties in the diagnosis of neurosyphilis and the importance of the use of a multidisciplinary team.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors were involved in the care of the patient. The summary, Case presentation, Investigations, Differential diagnosis, Treatment and Outcome and follow-up sections were written primarily by AH. The Background and Discussion were written mainly by JP. AW reviewed and contributed to all sections. JP holds responsibility for the overall content as guarantor.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.