Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Sudden-onset monocular blindness following orbito-zygomatic craniotomy for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm
  1. Soumya Mukherjee,
  2. Bhaskar Thakur,
  3. Christos Tolias
  1. Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Soumya Mukherjee, soumya1701{at}googlemail.com

Summary

We report the first case of sudden-onset ipsilateral blindness following orbito-zygomatic craniotomy and clipping of a ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm. CT showed no new intracranial or intraorbital pathology. Visual evoked potentials testing, electroretinography and diffuse flash stimulation all indicated loss of right optic nerve function. Although the patient made an excellent neurological recovery, complete right-sided monocular blindness persisted at 6-month follow-up. We postulate that external pressure on the eyeball, resulting in posterior ischaemic optic neuropathy, was the primary cause of our patient's blindness. This has been hypothesised in the 3 previously published cases of blindness following pterional or frontal craniotomy for aneurysm repair. Intraoperatively, the surgeon must avoid unnecessary pressure on the eyeballs and handle the optic nerves with the utmost care. Incomplete understanding of the mechanisms of sudden visual loss postcraniotomy may result in under-reporting of this adverse event. Nevertheless, its seriousness warrants discussion during consent.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors SM significantly contributed to the collation of patient data, literature review and writing of the manuscript. BT significantly contributed to the writing of the manuscript and revised it for intellectual content. CT was the attending neurosurgeon for the patient, contributed to the literature review and revised the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.