Statistics from Altmetric.com
A 25-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency department with orthostatic headache, nausea and dorsal stabbing pain not relieved with decubitus. Two days prior, she had undergone lumbar puncture after consulting for malaise, fever and headache. After admission, the pain progressed to the cervical and lumbar areas, though neurological examinations were normal. A spinal MRI showed an epidural cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection, which extended from D1 to S1 vertebral levels, displacing the spinal cord forward and surrounding the thecal sac (figure 1). During the following 48 h, the pain worsened, such that lying prone was the only position the patient tolerated. Analgaesia with NSAIDs, opioids, corticoids and caffeine failed to provide relief, so 5 days after admission an epidural blood patch (EBP) was decided on. Twenty cubic centimetres of autologous blood were injected into the epidural space within the L4–L5 level. After the procedure, the back pain subsided immediately, allowing the patient to maintain a sitting position for brief periods of time. She was left with only a mild orthostatic headache; this progressively disappeared over the next few days. A second MRI carried out 24 h later demonstrated complete reabsorption of the CSF collection, with the spinal cord and dura mater back at their normal positions. Also, the blood patch could be seen spreading through the lower levels (figure 2). After being in observation for possible complications of the EBP and successful withdrawal of pain medication, the patient was discharged 5 days after the procedure, pain free. She has remained asymptomatic ever since.
Epidural cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hygromas are mostly seen in children and neonates, but can also occur in adults, where they might be underdiagnosed. When these collections become clinically expressive, they usually present with severe pain, and only rarely with neurological signs on physical examination.1 ,2
Although traumatic lumbar puncture has been recognised as a risk factor for developing a dural tear, evidence to date does not clearly establish a correlation between this and an epidural CSF collection, and data identifying patients at risk are scarce, so physicians should be aware of the warning signs. Severe and progressing back pain extending beyond the puncture point and not related to position, or new neurological symptoms after lumbar puncture, should prompt spinal MRI.3
As these collections spontaneously regress in a few days in most cases, conservative management is usually recommended. Nevertheless, in patients suffering from severe and persistent pain, an epidural blood patch implant is a valuable resource because of its rapid effectiveness. Symptoms after the procedure may include back and radicular pain, but otherwise it is a relatively safe procedure.3
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Dr Natalia Perez de Arriba for collaborating in the implant of the blood patch.
Contributors MR-S, JV and PON evaluated the patient in inpatient clinic. JV followed the patient in outpatient clinic. AS performed the radiological examination. MR-S collected the data and wrote the manuscript. All the authors were involved in the conception of the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content. All the authors approved the final version to be submitted and published.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.