Responses

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Metastatic lung cancer, an interesting stroke mimic
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Re:Metastatic lung cancer, an interesting stroke mimic - Authors reply.
    • Hew D. Torrance, Royal College of Surgeons of England Research Fellow
    • Other Contributors:
      • Kai Lee Tan, and Ava Jackson

    Dear Dr Artul,

    Thank you for your question and kind comments regarding the case report. The mass seen is the same as in the Computerised Tomography (CT) and the Magnetic Resonance (MR) images. It is an isolated, large (3x2.5 cm) mass lesion. The CT was taken almost 48 hours prior to the MR as the patient had been incorrectly diagnosed and triaged to the stroke unit. As a result this time-frame may account for c...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Metastatic lung cancer, an interesting stroke mimic

    Dear author Nice case This case emphasizes the importance in differentiation between vasogenic edema of white matter due to SOL and edema due to stroke. The vasogenic edema due to SOL in general doesn't respect the anatomy and in the other hand edema due to stroke in general yes it respect the anatomy of the vessels territory and anatomical lobes. However I have one question: Is the mass seen in the CT is the same mass...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.