Responses

Download PDFPDF
Reminder of important clinical lesson
Massive epistaxis in a patient with Eisenmenger syndrome: illustrating the clot-versus-bleed conundrum
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Erythrocytosis versus polycythaemia in Eisenmenger syndrome: not a conundrum
    • Matina Prapa, Doctor
    • Other Contributors:
      • Gerhard P. Diller, Lorna Swan, Michael A. Gatzoulis and Konstantinos Dimopoulos

    We should comment on the case report by Liu et al. highlighting the difficulties in treating patients with Eisenmenger syndrome(1). The haematological complications of cyanotic congenital heart disease are well described in literature, since the systematic description of the condition by Paul Wood in 1958(2). This paradoxical state of affair between bleeding and thrombotic diathesis continues to puzzle us. Bleeding, typical...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.