Article Text

Reminder of important clinical lesson
Warfarin, head injury and bruising
Free
  1. Marc Wallace1,
  2. Emma D’Amato1,
  3. Jasroop Chana1,
  4. Antoni Chan2
  1. 1Royal Berkshire Hospital, Department of Medicine, London Road, Reading, Berkshire RG1 5AN, UK
  2. 2Royal Berkshire Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, London Road, Reading, Berkshire RG1 5AN, UK
  1. Correspondence to Marc Wallace, mwallace{at}doctors.org.uk

Summary

A 75-year-old woman with a history of recurrent pulmonary emboli and atrial fibrillation presented with shortness of breath. Her warfarin had been stopped 4 weeks previously after a minor fall where a head injury and extensive facial “bruising” was noted. A computed tomography pulmonary angiogram subsequently confirmed another pulmonary embolus. On examination the discolouration was still evident, but it was noted to be in a photosensitive distribution, and on further questioning it was determined that it had been present for some months before the fall. The patient had been on minocycline for acne rosacea for several years and the diagnosis of minocycline induced hyperpigmentation allowed for a more considered decision to restart warfarin.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Background

Warfarin treatment in the context of falls and head injury often poses a difficult clinical conundrum. We present a case where a decision involving the fine balance of risk and benefit in this scenario may potentially have been influenced by the presence of a misinterpreted drug side effect.

Minocycline induced skin pigmentation is a well recognised drug side effect that usually begins at around 3 months but has a prevalence as high as 41% of patients at 1 year in certain patient groups.1 This case illustrates the importance of a thorough past medical history, drug history (including attention to all possible side effects) and examination as well as demonstrating the adverse consequence of withholding warfarin in this context.

Case presentation

A 75-year-old woman was admitted with acute breathlessness. The patient had a background of recurrent pulmonary emboli and atrial fibrillation and, up until 4 weeks before admission, had been on long term anticoagulation with warfarin for this condition since 2001.

We elucidated that following an emergency department attendance at another hospital (with a fall and minor head injury) the warfarin had been stopped partly due to “extensive facial bruising”.

Past medical history included mild hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, hip and knee replacements for osteoarthritis, and acne rosacea (diagnosed in 1985) for which she had been taking oral minocycline 100 mg modified release capsules once daily for 12 years. Additional medication included lansoprazole 30 mg once daily, paracetamol 1g four times daily, Adcal D3 (calcium/vitamin D3 supplement) three times daily, and a beclomethasone 100 μg inhaler.

On further questioning the patient reported that she had noticed a change in the pigmentation of the skin over several months and commented that friends and medical personnel had also remarked on facial “bruising” during this time.

On examination she was apyrexial with an irregularly irregular pulse rate of 80 beats/min, a blood pressure of 138/76 mm Hg, and a respiratory rate of 18/min. Atrial fibrillation was confirmed by electrocardiogram (ECG). The chest was clear to auscultation with oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry being 91% on air. Arterial blood gas measurements taken at the time confirmed this and demonstrated mild hypoxaemia with a pO2 8.9 kPa and normal pH and pCO2. The abdomen was soft and non-tender and there were no focal neurological signs. There were no signs of deep vein thrombosis or pelvic masses.

Extensive pigmentation was present on the face and was described by the patient as similar on presentation as compared to when her warfarin was stopped. Symmetrical, bilateral, confluent, blue-grey macules were noted in a photosensitive distribution over the eyebrows, malar region, nasal bridge and chin (fig 1). Concomitant pigmentation of the sclera was also visible.

Figure 1

Blue-grey pigmented macules mimicking bruising. Note the photosensitive distribution including the malar region, bridge of nose and chin together with sparing of the orbital recesses.

Additionally, the finding of blue-grey discolouration of the proximal portion of the nails bilaterally in the hands further supported the diagnosis of minocycline induced hyperpigmentation (fig 2).

Figure 2

Proximal nail hyperpigmentation.

Investigations

Haematobiochemical investigation demonstrated normal inflammatory markers and an elevated d-dimer of 3368 μg/l.

A chest x-ray was normal; however, the suspected diagnosis of a pulmonary embolus was confirmed by computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) which indicated filling defects within the left upper lobe pulmonary tree (within the proximal apicoposterior and lingua pulmonary arteries). There was also a degree of subsegmental atelectasis in the right lower lobe and mild cardiomegaly with small pleural effusions (fig 3).

Figure 3

Segmental filling defect (as shown by red arrow) on computed tomography pulmonary angiography, indicating a small pulmonary embolus.

Differential diagnosis

Differential diagnoses for facial pigmentation are broad but include:

  • Trauma

  • Medications—amiodarone, thiazides, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

  • Endocrine—Addison’s disease

  • Malar flush—sun exposure, acne rosacea, mitral stenosis, systemic lupus

  • Chloasma/melasma—oestrogen, pregnancy

  • Lentigo maligna

  • Neoplastic lesions

  • Congenital pigmentation

  • Vascular lesions—port wine staining.

Treatment

The diagnoses of a recurrent pulmonary embolus and minocycline induced hyperpigmentation were explained to the patient and a management plan was agreed. Warfarin was recommenced and a treatment dose of low molecular weight heparin was prescribed until a therapeutic INR (2.0–3.0) had been achieved.

Outcome and follow-up

Information was given to the patient regarding alternative options for managing her acne rosacea in order that she could consider the suitability of these together with her general practitioner. This included a potential trial without treatment, topical metronidazole applied twice daily (either as a cream or gel), or systemic options such as oral metronidazole. The patient was discharged uneventfully and we were pleased to learn that the pigmentation appears to have improved noticeably since discontinuing the minocycline.

Discussion

Elderly patients who fall while on anticoagulant treatment present a difficult clinical situation for prescribing doctors who are understandably concerned about the risks of catastrophic intracranial bleeding. This results in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and frequent falls often nebulously being deemed “unsuitable for warfarin”.

While each patient should be reviewed on their own merits, the decision to stop anticoagulation in this group of patients is less well supported by evidence. The actual risk–benefit ratio in continuing treatment appears to favour the beneficial end of the spectrum, and physician’s unfounded or misaligned concerns are demonstrated by systematic review of the literature.2,3

Patients with a high risk of falling do have a higher incidence of intracranial bleeding than those who are at low risk of falls. As we would expect, the addition of warfarin does result in a higher mortality from intracranial bleeding, but interestingly it has a minimal effect on the occurrence rate of such.4,5 Furthermore, although the risk of falls rises with age this does not appear to negate the benefits of warfarinisation; the BAFTA trial5 demonstrated an annual risk of stroke of 1.8% in the warfarin arm versus 3.8% in the aspirin arm and an absolute reduction of 2% in patients over 75 years of age.

Importantly, in those with a high validated clinical prediction rule CHADS2 score (2 and above) the risk of embolic stroke has been shown to far outstrip that of bleeding;6 our patient had a score of 2 which would put her annual risk of stroke at approximately 4–6%. Warfarin has been shown to reduce the composite mortality of stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, myocardial infarction and death in this group.7 This means that despite the increased mortality from traumatic head injury on warfarin following a fall, those who are at high risk of embolic stroke confer benefit from anticoagulation due to their even greater embolic stroke risk.

Minocycline induced skin pigmentation is a well recognised drug side effect that usually begins at around 3 months but has a prevalence as high as 41% of patients at 1 year in certain patient groups.1 There are thre main recognised types.8 Type 1 involves pigmentation of old scarring, especially acne scarring on the face; type 2 shows pigmentation of normal skin on the lower legs and forearms; and type 3 favours a more photosensitive distribution.8 In addition, pigmentation of other structures such as teeth, nails, bones, sclera and the thyroid are recognised.911 Pigmentation types 1 and 2 are associated with extracellular iron and melanin deposition in macrophages, whereas type 3 patterns are due to basal keratinocytes melanin accumulation only.8 The discolouration is generally reversible upon discontinuing medication but can be permanent, especially with the photosensitive type.8

Pigmentation of the skin can be mistaken for bruising12 and, in this case, we were provided with a useful highlight of a complex clinical decision that can be aided by an evidenced based approach.

Learning points

  • Hyperpigmentation is a relatively common side effect of minocycline, especially with prolonged use, and may mimic bruising.

  • In the clinical context of a patient on warfarin presenting with a head injury, close attention to the medication history, side effects and an individual risk–benefit analysis should be performed when deciding whether or not to continue anticoagulant treatment.

  • Regular review of long term medications with surveillance for side effects is essential.

  • Falls and age alone are not an indication for discontinuing warfarin in patients at high risk of embolic stroke as this generally still outweighs the risk of intracranial bleeding.

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our utmost thanks to our patient for providing her consent for publication. In addition, we are extremely grateful to the medical photography department at the Royal Berkshire Hospital for their technical assistance.

REFERENCES

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Patient consent: Patient/guardian consent was obtained for publication.