Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Post-pneumonectomy coronary artery bypass graft surgery
  1. Shirin Siddiqi and
  2. Amanpreet Sherwal
  1. Surgery, Conemaugh Health System, Johnstown, Pennsylvania, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Shirin Siddiqi; ssiddiqi{at}conemaugh.org

Abstract

Postpneumonectomy changes, including ipsilateral diaphragmatic elevation and rib crowding, mediastinal shifting of the heart and reduction of respiratory functional reserve by 45%–55%, make cardiac surgery challenging in terms of access to the heart and great vessels. There is a paucity of literature on coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in patients with a history of pneumonectomy. We report a case of a male in his 70s with a history of left pneumonectomy who underwent a successful on-pump CABG surgery using the left internal mammary artery graft and great saphenous vein graft. The patient was extubated postoperatively and discharged in a stable condition. With no consensus available for optimal preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative management for these high-risk patients, our case report adds to the rare literature regarding successful on-pump CABG after pneumonectomy.

  • Cardiothoracic surgery
  • Ischaemic heart disease

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors The following authors were responsible for drafting of the text, sourcing and editing of clinical images, investigation results, drawing original diagrams and algorithms and critical revision for important intellectual content: SS and AS. The following authors gave final approval of the manuscript: SS and AS.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.