Article Text
Abstract
A male patient in his early 30s underwent minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. According to standard Nuss bar procedure, a 30-degree thoracoscope was introduced through a right midaxillary 10 mm trocar in the 4th intercostal space. Two bars and five stabilisers were placed in a retromuscular position. After discharge, the patient experienced right upper back pain requiring prolonged opioid usage for three months and right scapular winging limiting functional activities. After conservative treatment with physiotherapy for 11 months, the patient still suffered from residual scapula alata with pain and muscle weakness. On suspicion of long thoracic nerve neuropraxia related to the thoracoscope placement, an electromyogram was conducted 16 months following surgery, revealing mild polyphasic potentials of the serratus anterior muscle without abnormal muscle unit action potential. After extended conservative therapy for another year, physical examination 28 months after surgery showed almost complete resolution of scapular winging.
- surgery
- cardiothoracic surgery
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors IEWGL, EJvP, YLJV and ERdL were responsible for drafting of the text, sourcing and editing of clinical images, investigation results, drawing original diagrams and algorithms and critical revision for important intellectual content. IEWGL, EJvP, YLJV and ERdL gave final approval of the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.