Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure for the second twin with neck mass in a twin pregnancy with vertex/breech presentation
  1. Ilka Tan,
  2. Anju Bhatia and
  3. June Vic Khi Tan
  1. Maternal Fetal Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ilka Tan; dr.ilka.tan{at}gmail.com

Abstract

We report a case of a dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy where twin B was diagnosed with a large multi-loculated exophytic cystic neck mass arising from the right side with involvement of the right proximal upper limb and significant mass effect on the trachea diagnosed during antenatal MRI. After multidisciplinary discussion, an ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure was planned given concerns about airway obstruction in twin B. Successful EXIT was performed with the delivery of twin A first, followed by an intraoperative external cephalic version of twin B and subsequent delivery of the fetal head and intubation on maternal circulation.

  • Cesarean Section
  • Pregnancy
  • Materno-fetal medicine
  • Congenital disorders
  • Ultrasonography

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors The following authors were responsible for drafting of the text, sourcing and editing of clinical images, investigation results, drawing original diagrams and algorithms, and critical revision for important intellectual content: IT, AB and JVKT. The following authors gave final approval of the manuscript: IT, AB and JVKT. The following author is responsible for the overall content as guarantor: IT.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.