Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Medial sural artery perforator flap following orbital exenteration
  1. Daniah ALNafisee,
  2. Taylor Cave and
  3. Brent A Chang
  1. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Daniah ALNafisee; dnafisee{at}gmail.com

Abstract

An extended orbital exenteration defect in a male in his mid-80s was successfully reconstructed with a medial sural artery perforator flap. To our knowledge, this flap has not been described in the literature for such defects until now. While it may require meticulous intramuscular perforator dissection, it provides several advantages; it is thin, pliable, has a long pedicle of large calibre facilitating microanastomosis and provides adequate coverage where the amount of chimeric muscle can easily be tailored to the defect’s surface area and volume. In addition, its robust vascular supply can withstand volume changes post radiation therapy. Two years after surgery, the patient has healed well with an excellent functional outcome.

  • Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology
  • Head and neck cancer
  • Plastic and reconstructive surgery
  • Ophthalmology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors The following authors were responsible for drafting of the text, sourcing and editing of clinical images, investigation results, drawing original diagrams and algorithms, and critical revision for important intellectual content: DALN and BAC. The following authors gave final approval of the manuscript: BAC, TC and DALN. BAC (BC) is responsible for the overall content as guarantor.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.