Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Endourological management of ureteric stump syndrome
  1. Nikita Shrivastava,
  2. Priyank Bhargava and
  3. Gautam Ram Choudhary
  1. Urology, AIIMS Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Priyank Bhargava; drpriyankb{at}gmail.com

Abstract

A man in his 50s presented with right flank pain and intermittent haematuria for 15 days. He was evaluated and diagnosed to have bilateral staghorn renal calculi with left poorly functioning kidney. He underwent right kidney stone clearance followed by laparoscopic left simple nephrectomy. Postoperatively, he developed recurrent urinary tract infections. On evaluation, non-contrast CT of the abdomen revealed calculus in left ureteral stump and he was diagnosed to have ureteric stump syndrome. He underwent ureteroscopy which revealed multiple stump calculi and complete stone clearance was achieved. Currently, the patient is asymptomatic and doing well after a follow-up of 1 year.

  • Urinary tract infections
  • Urological surgery
  • Hematuria

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors Concept and design; manuscript editing and manuscript review: NS, PB, GRC. Definition of intellectual content, literature search; data collection and statistical analysis; manuscript preparation; illustration: NS, PB. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.