Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Laterally extended endopelvic resection as part of the surgical management of disseminated retroperitoneal leiomyomatosis mimicking low-grade sarcoma in a patient with a solitary kidney
  1. Maaedah Khan1,
  2. Sally Eltawab1,
  3. William Gietzmann2 and
  4. Hooman Soleymani majd1
  1. 1Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
  2. 2Department of Urology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Hooman Soleymani majd; hooman.soleymanimajd{at}msd.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

Leiomyomas are common benign uterine smooth muscle tumours. Rarer subsets may demonstrate aggressive extrauterine growth which mimic metastatic disease. We discuss the case of a female patient in her 40s, with a long-standing atrophic right kidney, presenting with a 17 cm uterine mass demonstrating bilateral para-aortic and pelvic sidewall spread. Although biopsies favoured the diagnosis of a benign tumour, a leiomyosarcoma could not be excluded. The surgical complexity of the case was compounded by a tumour residing close to the only functioning kidney and engulfment of the inferior mesenteric artery. The surgical procedures indicated were a radical hysterectomy, the laterally extended endopelvic resection procedure to achieve clear margins in the pelvic sidewall and a left hemicolectomy. In the absence of formal guidelines, we present this challenging case to provide clarity into the histological assessment and surgical management of rare leiomyomas, as well as an overview of the current literature.

  • Surgery
  • Obstetrics and gynaecology
  • Gynecological cancer

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors The following authors were responsible for drafting of the text, sourcing and editing of clinical images, investigation results, drawing original diagrams and algorithms, and critical revision for important intellectual content—MK, SE, WG and HSM. The following authors gave final approval of the manuscript—MK, SE, WG and HSM.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.