Article Text

Download PDFPDF
High spinal cord injury precipitating syncope: a rare indication for pacemaker insertion
  1. Isa Khan,
  2. Timothy G Scully,
  3. Andrew W Teh and
  4. Geoffrey R Wong
  1. Cardiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Timothy G Scully; tgraemescully{at}gmail.com

Abstract

The current evidence for vasovagal syncope management is that cardiac pacing is only indicated in a highly select group of patients where symptoms can be linked to bradycardic episodes. High spinal cord injury can lead to autonomic dysfunction and sympathetic nervous system hypoactivity. A high spinal cord injury can theoretically precipitate profound bradycardia leading to haemodynamic instability and syncope. A patient in his 50s with a history of C2 spinal injury was admitted to our tertiary centre for management of what was initially thought to be septic shock causing hypotension and syncope. With evidence to suggest this patient’s presentation may be profound reflex syncope in the context of unopposed parasympathetic signalling, consensus was reached to implant a permanent pacemaker. Remarkably, the patient’s haemodynamics stabilised and there were no further episodes of syncope.

  • Arrhythmias
  • Spinal cord
  • Adult intensive care

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors IK was involved in identifying the novel nature of the patient’s presentation and was the primary author of the manuscript. TS collected the initial patient data and helped to co-write the manuscript. AWT and GRW provided expert electrophysiology opinion on the initial case and contributed to the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.