Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Description
A man in his 50s had a fall from a motorcycle and sustained an injury to his left wrist. On examination, he was found to have tenderness over his wrist with range of movements of the wrist being restricted due to pain. On making a fist, the second metacarpal head was found to be in line with the third and found metacarpal heads (Murphy’s sign positive).
Posteroanterior radiograph of the wrist was performed. It was confirmed to be a true posteroanterior view by the presence of the ulnar styloid medial to the ulnar shaft (figure 1A). The lunate was found to be malaligned, overlapping the scaphoid, triquetrum and capitate (figure 1B). Gilula’s second arc corresponding to the distal articular surface of the proximal carpal row was found to be disrupted (figure 1C). Lunate was found to be overlapping with the capitate, indicating the proximal migration of the capitate (figure 1D). A lateral radiograph of the wrist was performed. It was confirmed to be a true lateral view by the ulnar head being superimposed over the distal radius, overlap of second-fifth metacarpal shafts and the volar border of pisiform lying in the middle third of the scaphoid (figure 2A). The lunate was found to be volarly dislocated (figure 2B). The spilled teacup sign was noted (figure 2C). The radius and capitate were found to be aligned with the lunate volarly displaced and malaligned (figure 2D). The radiolunate angle which is normally less than 15° was found to be increased (figure 2E). No fractures were noted in any of the radiographs. These were the typical radiological features of an isolated lunate dislocation. He was advised to undergo open reduction, repair of ligaments and fixation. However, he was not willing for surgical management and was lost to further follow-up.
Perilunate dislocations are rare traumatic injuries of the wrist. They usually occur due to a fall with the wrist in extension, ulnar deviation and intercarpal supination. They are classified according to the Mayfield classification system.1 Among these, lunate dislocations represent only the type IV injury, which are among the most unstable. Isolated lunate dislocations are often unrecognised as the rest of the carpus remains aligned.2 The rate of incorrect diagnosis is reported to be as high as 25%.3 Careful analysis of radiographs is therefore required for its diagnosis. Neglected lunate dislocations can lead to median nerve dysfunction, carpal instability, avascular necrosis of lunate and arthritis.4
Patient’s perspective
I visited a different hospital at first, where I was told that there was no fracture and the X-ray was normal. However, I still had pain and swelling in my wrist. So after 1 week, I visited this hospital, where they told me I have a dislocation of a bone in my wrist which is causing the pain.
Learning points
Isolated lunate dislocations represent a rare subsection of perilunate dislocations which are often undiagnosed due to the rest of the carpus remaining aligned.
Careful analysis of radiographs is required for diagnosis, indicated by disruptions of Gilula’s arc, lunocapitate overlap on posteroanterior radiographs and spilling teacup sign, increased radiolunate angle on lateral radiographs.
Neglected lunate dislocations can lead to median nerve dysfunction, carpal instability, avascular necrosis of lunate and arthritis.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
Contributors SP obtained the digital images of radiographs and was responsible for the writing of the draft of the manuscript. MK was the chief orthopaedic surgeon under whom the patient was evaluated and guided the entire process of preparation of the article, including reviewing the article. SP and MK were both involved in the evaluation of the patient, analysis of radiographs and patient care.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.