Although neurological manifestations such as headache and myalgias have been observed with COVID-19, presentation with more serious neurological illness is uncommon and rare. We report a case of a middle-aged woman who presented to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. Her clinical presentation was primarily neurological rather than the more common presentation with respiratory manifestations. She presented with generalised tonic–clonic seizures, along with history of undocumented low-grade fever and generalised body aches. The positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR nasal swab, the cerebrospinal fluid analysis (lymphocytic pleocytosis) and electroencephalogram were consistent with viral encephalitis; brain imaging was unremarkable. This case highlights the variable presenting features of COVID-19 infection as patients can primarily present with neurological manifestations in the absence of significant respiratory symptoms. We believe it is important to recognise neurological disease associated with SARS-CoV-2 in patients with asymptomatic respiratory infection.
- infectious diseases
- infection (neurology)
Statistics from Altmetric.com
As of 2 December 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been 264 million cases of novel SARS-CoV-2 and the pandemic has resulted in 5.23 million deaths worldwide.1 2 It is gradually being recognised that COVID-19 can present with neurological manifestations in the absence of the usual respiratory symptoms. These neurological manifestations of COVID-19 are common and can be observed in up to 36.4% of patients.2 3 Several theories proposed include the passage of virus through the blood–brain barrier following viraemia, SARS-CoV-2 binding to the ACE receptor type 2 (ACE-2) cells in brain vascular endothelium and post viral autoimmune process along with metabolic and systemic complication of the disease. The olfactory bulb is the most accepted plausible route of the virus to the brain.2 4 The more common neurological manifestations of COVID-19 include headache, anosmia, ageusia and myalgia/myositis.2 4 5 Rare complications have been reported and include cases of acute cerebrovascular disease, encephalitis and encephalopathy, Guillain-Barre syndrome and haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. The incidence of these complications ranges from 6% to 36%.6 As the COVID-19 pandemic has progressed, varied manifestation of the disease, that is, respiratory, gastrointestinal, neurological and cardiac, has been observed. Physicians should anticipate neurological manifestations as an initial presenting feature in patients with COVID-19. We hereby report a case of COVID-19 encephalitis in which generalised tonic–clonic seizures were the presenting feature of the disease. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of COVID-19 encephalitis with CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) analysis, brain imaging and EEG (electroencephalogram) findings in Pakistan.
A middle-aged woman presented to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital with an episode of generalised tonic–clonic seizures at home. It lasted for 60 min, all four limbs became rigid along with up-rolling of the eyes, frothing from mouth; however, no tongue biting or urinary incontinence was seen. She also had a history of (undocumented) low-grade fever, body aches, along with diarrhoea 3 days ago. Her medical history revealed that she had diabetes mellitus and central diabetes insipidus and was taking tablet sitagliptin/metformin 50/500 mg (once daily) and desmopressin 0.2 mg (at bedtime) as her home medication. She had no recent history of contact with a COVID-19 positive person or any visit to a public place. There was no history of smoking, addictions or substance abuse such as opium use. Physical examination revealed that she was afebrile, blood pressure was 141/100 mm Hg, heart rate was 90 beats/min, respiratory rate 20 breaths/min and oxygen saturation was 88% on room air. The airway was patent. No cyanosis or sweating was seen. Neurological examination revealed an acutely confused state, GCS score (Glasgow Coma Scale) was 13/15 (eye opening—4; verbal—3; motor—6); there was spontaneous eye opening, she was unresponsive to painful stimulus and all four limbs were rigid. Examination of the cranial nerves was unremarkable. Her pupils were bilaterally equally reactive to light with no asymmetry. Motor examination including tone, power, tendon reflexes showed bilateral upper limbs flexed and rigid. Coordination was difficult to assess at this time. Minimal neck stiffness was present. No nystagmus or pronator drift was evident. Chest auscultation revealed crepitation on the right side of the chest. The cardiovascular and abdominal examination was unremarkable.
Complete blood count showed a normocytic, normochromic picture. Serum creatinine and C-reactive protein levels were raised (table 1). Arterial blood gas indicated hypoxia. Serum D-dimer was 1.0 mg/L FEU, while serum ferritin and lactate dehydrogenase levels were normal. Serum creatinine phosphokinase levels were 623 (34–145) IU/L and lactate was 5.6 mmol/L, indicating post-ictal elevation. On serial monitoring, lactate levels normalised. Procalcitonin levels were less than 0.5 ng/mL, representing low risk for any localised bacterial infection and the blood culture also did not grow any organism as well.
Nasal swab specimen
Nasal swab for COVID-19 qualitative RT-PCR (real-time reverse-transcription PCR) was positive.
Cerebrospinal fluid sample
CSF detailed report (CSF DR) showed glucose 133 (40–70) mg/dL (serum 260 mg/dL), proteins 68 mg/dL (15–40) with lymphocytic pleocytosis (95%). BioFire Film Array meningitis/encephalitis panel was negative for 14 pathogens. This test uses a multiplex PCR assay for the detection of 14 common pathogens that can cause central nervous system (CNS) infections (table 2).
Chest X-ray showed inhomogeneous airspace shadowing involving the right lung upper and mid-zone, suggesting lobar consolidation and aspiration pneumonia (figure 1).
A CT scan of the head without contrast showed no established infarct, acute intracranial haematoma or mass effect, excluding a major structural cause of epilepsy (figure 2).
MRI of the brain showed normal grey and white matter differentiation, no acute infarction on Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and no abnormal parenchymal enhancement on post contrast imaging, suggesting no epileptogenic foci (figure 3). Time of flight MR angiography images revealed normal anterior and posterior intracranial vasculature, with no high-grade stenosis or occlusion in major vessels.
Post contrast MR venography (MRV) showed no filling defect in the venous sinuses.
EEG showed slow posterior dominant rhythm (in theta range), as well as intermittent bilateral left anterior dominant and generalised rhythmic delta slow waves, suggesting mild encephalopathy (figure 4).
Considering the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, other differential diagnoses were ruled out to make a diagnosis of COVID-19 encephalitis. Our patient did not have any electrolyte abnormalities. Her blood sugar level was in range, thereby eliminating hypoglycaemia. Her creatinine was mildly elevated, but she did not have any known renal disease, thereby ruling out uraemic encephalopathy. Therefore, the above-mentioned data ruled out all metabolic causes of generalised tonic–clonic seizures resulting in convulsive status epilepticus. Anoxic encephalopathy was ruled out as the arterial blood gas did not show hypoxia significant enough to lead to a neurological injury. ECG was unremarkable, eliminating cardiogenic syncope leading to a secondary hypoxia. Later, neurovascular imaging showed no evidence of stroke or cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Infective causes, that is, viral, bacterial and fungal causes, were looked into in the CSF DR as well as the Bio-Fire meningitis/encephalitis panel. The possibility of autoimmune encephalitis could not be excluded. Immunotherapy with steroids was started immediately, owing to the suspicion of meningitis and its complications. Furthermore, autoantibody tests such as NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor antibodies were not done as she did not have any related comorbidities7 and the symptoms resolved with conservative management.
Our patient received her first aid in the emergency department. Primary care was initiated. Her airway was patent, supplemental oxygen given via face mask. Vitals were checked. Intravenous access was obtained, and blood samples were sent for analysis. Intravenous diazepam was given immediately. Intravenous paracetamol, ceftriaxone, vancomycin, acyclovir and dexamethasone were given along with intravenous Ringer’s lactate for hydration. Intravenous injection of levetiracetam 1000 mg and later 2 mg intravenous midazolam and 1500 mg intravenous phenytoin were also given. She was admitted in special care COVID-19 isolation unit and was managed on the lines of non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia with suspected meningoencephalitis. A lumbar puncture was performed and the CSF was sent for analysis. Antimicrobial therapy was continued on meningitic doses— intravenous ceftriaxone 2000 mg two times per day, intravenous vancomycin 750 mg 6 hourly and intravenous acyclovir 750 mg 8 hourly. Therapy of intravenous dexamethasone 8 mg 8 hourly was given adjunctively with antibiotics for suspected bacterial meningitis complications. Monotherapy with tablet levetiracetam 500 mg two times per day along with tablet pyridoxine 50 mg once daily was continued. Antibiotics and steroids were discontinued once CSF analysis did not show any evidence of bacterial meningitis. For her acute kidney injury, gentle hydration with intravenous normal saline at 75 mL/hour was continued. Her blood sugar levels were monitored and insulin Humalog sliding scale given accordingly. Desmopressin 0.1 mg two times per day was also added due to her diagnosed diabetes insipidus.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient did not have any residual neurological sequelae. She became fully oriented, with complete resolution of her confusion and disorientation. She was discharged home 4 days later, on levetiracetam along with desmopressin and oral hypoglycaemics. Her isolation continued for a total of 10 days’ duration after COVID-19 PCR positive test result. She followed up in internal medicine, neurology and endocrinology teleclinics 1 week later for her follow-up status. No repeat testing of the COVID-19 PCR swab was done. The patient continues to live comfortably and has resumed her daily routine. The patient has routinely followed-up in neurology clinics and has remained seizure-free since the index presentation.
SARS-CoV-2 virus belongs to the beta genus classification of the human Coronavirus family. The spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 use ACE-2 to bind to cells. The location of ACE-2 receptors in the CNS has a significance with respect to COVID-19 encephalitis since expression in the cerebral cortex and brainstem has been observed.8
Different mechanisms have been postulated regarding the route of infiltration of the virus into the CNS. Neurological disease may be the consequence of cytokine-related injury, retrograde travel of the virus along the olfactory nerve, or the CNS vasculature being breached by direct binding to the ACE-2 receptors on endothelial cells of the blood–brain barrier.6
Neurological manifestations have previously been observed in other coronavirus infections, such as during the SARS-CoV and MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome) outbreaks. Lau et al reported a case in 2004 where SARS-CoV-1 PCR was positive in the CSF of a patient presenting with generalised tonic–clonic seizure.9 Similarly, Hung et al reported another patient with encephalopathy, seizures and presence of SARS-CoV RNA in CSF was also noted.10 MERS (2012) was also associated with severe neurological syndrome. Harthi et al delineated the case of three patients who developed neurological symptoms, two out of three patients’ CSF sample analysis reported negative for MERS-CoV RT-PCR.11 Therefore, neurological manifestations to COVID-19 were not unanticipated.
Encephalitis can present with acute onset fever, vomiting, seizures and altered consciousness level.12 Ye et al13 reported a SARS-CoV-2 positive male patient in Wuhan who presented with decreased consciousness and confusion. Rare presentation of COVID-19 encephalitis, with catatonic syndrome as the initial presentation of the disease has also been reported.14
The UK national registry of patients with COVID-19 with neurological complications reported altered mental status in 31% of 125 patients, among these patients 13% presented with encephalopathy and encephalitis was observed in 6%.15 Bernard-Valnet et al16 also reported regarding a patient with COVID-19 presenting with tonic–clonic seizure. Similarly, our patient presented in a unique manner with generalised tonic–clonic seizures and loss of consciousness. Later, the patient tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on her nasal swab. Physical evaluation of neurological symptoms is important and leads to a comprehensive differential diagnosis.
CSF analysis of our patient revealed pleocytosis (15/mm3) with a predominant (95%) lymphocytic abundance leading to the diagnosis of viral encephalitis, presumably COVID-19 encephalitis. The Bio-Fire meningitis/encephalitis panel also reported negative for any microorganism. Huang et al17 and Kamal et al18 reported about patients admitted for encephalitis with a positive nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2, to concomitantly have CSF to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR. Our patient had a viral CSF picture but SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on the CSF sample could not be performed. CSF analysis of a large cohort of 30 patients with COVID-19 with neurological symptoms who underwent lumbar puncture showed negative RT-PCR results for SARS-CoV-2 in CSF.8
Our limitation was not being able to test the CSF for SARS-CoV-2, as this facility is not available in our hospital. However, CSF SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR is not necessary for diagnosis of COVID-19-associated encephalitis. Ye et al13 reported encephalitis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection; the CSF analysis was within normal limits as well as negative for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. A recent reported case discussed a COVID-19 positive patient with prior structural brain disease who developed seizures and was intubated, while his lumbar puncture was suggestive of viral meningitis.19 Although the definitive diagnosis of viral encephalitis requires CSF virus isolation, due to transient CSF viral shedding and low CSF titres, this can be difficult to assess. Another report described a case of COVID-19-associated encephalopathy, with lymphocytosis in CSF analysis and CSF PCR negative for SARS- CoV-2; this patient was successfully treated with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIG).20 In contrast to this, our patient improved on conservative therapy with oral levetiracetam and pyridoxine. IVIG therapy would have been considered in case of severe COVID-19 infection or no improvement with conservative management; moreover, IVIG is an expensive therapy in a low-source country such as Pakistan.
Based on MRI and EEG findings, varied methods of diagnosing COVID-19 encephalitis have been reported in the literature. Vandervost21 et al reported a case with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 on nasopharyngeal testing and normal lumbar puncture findings; however, MRI brain showed asymmetric Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensity of the left medial temporal cortex associated with mild gyral expansion and this lead to the diagnosis of encephalitis associated with SARS-CoV-2. On the contrary, our patient had normal MRI, MRA and MRV brain findings. Langley et al22 reported a case of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) as a neurological sequelae of COVID-19 with characteristic brain MRI findings and CSF analysis.22
Furthermore, in a systematic review of EEG findings in patients with COVID-19 by Arun et al,23 common indications for EEG in patients with COVID-19 were altered mental status in 61.7% and seizure-like activity or events in 31.2% patients. Abnormal EEG findings were reported in 88% of their subjects,23 while a meta-analysis also evidenced abnormal background activity and generalised slowing to be present in a large proportion of patients, that is, 96.1%.24 The most common background abnormality noted in the systematic review was diffuse slowing as opposed to slow posterior dominant rhythm in the theta range in our patient and this was present in only 14 out of 617 patients.23 Arun et al23 also determined that generalised rhythmic activity was seen in 5.2% of the cases in the systematic review of the periodic rhythmic EEG patterns of patients with COVID-19, and subsequently evidenced in our patients’ EEG as well. However, absence of a control EEG to determine resolution of electroencephalographic changes over short-time period in our case was a limitation.
I am very grateful to all the doctors and paramedical staff for my treatment. I have recovered completely, and I feel grateful to have received optimal medical care at the appropriate time. It was difficult to isolate myself in a room and to be away from my family. My young kids were also in quarantine, and immensely missed their mother. For quite some time after being discharged home from the hospital, I remained depressed and stayed quiet at home. I would ponder about how it all happened and how I contracted COVID-19. But it was my husband and sister, who really helped me get back to my daily routine. I feel blessed to have been given back life again. Additionally, I feel that the masses should practice precautionary measures for COVID-19; and help those affected by COVID-19.
Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion on neurological manifestations as initial presentation of COVID-19 during this pandemic; this presentation remains a unique entity.
A simple and cost-effective test, electroencephalogram can be considered an essential tool in diagnosing COVID-19 encephalopathy.
Conservative management of COVID-19-associated encephalopathy, with antiepileptic drugs as prophylaxis for generalised tonic seizures and supportive treatment can result in good outcomes.
Patient consent for publication
Contributors The contributors of this work include AFS for direct medical care and draft of the structure of the article; SS for drafting the article and literature review; TE for direct patient care, article editing and the submission process; and ZM for direct patient care, final approval of manuscript as well as being the most responsible physician. We are thankful to the patient for consenting to publish her case.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.