Statistics from Altmetric.com
A 22-year-old woman with a history of type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) presented with nausea, vomiting and epigastric discomfort for 3 days. On presentation, she had blood pressure of 80/50 mm Hg and a heart rate of 120 bpm. No significant findings were noted on systemic physical examination. She was resuscitated with intravenous fluids and started on insulin drip for a blood glucose level of 800 mg/dL. Labs were significant for a white cell count of 20×109/L, lactic acid of 54 mg/dL, bicarb of 26 mEq/L, anion gap of 10 and haemoglobin A1c of 18.2%. Urinalysis showed +2 leucocyte esterase, too numerous to count white blood cells and bacteria and negative nitrite. She was admitted as a case of hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state precipitated by possible urinary tract infection (UTI). She was started on ceftriaxone for UTI. Blood cultures came positive for Gram-negative bacilli. The next day, she reported of nonradiating right-sided flank pain of moderate intensity. CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis was done, which showed markedly enlarged right kidney with gas in the lower pole and a small volume of gas in the collecting system consistent with emphysematous pyelonephritis (EP) (figure 1A,B). Antibiotics were tailored to meropenem as per infectious diseases team recommendations. The urology team recommended continuing with medical treatment as the patient was improving clinically. Final blood and urine cultures showed Enterobacter cloacae sensitive to meropenem. She completed 14 days of antibiotics and improved symptomatically, and a follow-up imaging revealed total resolution of infection. Unfortunately, due to patient’s noncompliance to the insulin use leading to uncontrolled DM (repeated HbA1c of 16.1 %), our patient suffered from another episode of EP in the left kidney 1 year later, which was also treated medically (figure 1C).
EP is an acute necrotising infection of renal parenchyma and surrounding tissues, which leads to gas formation. It is associated with a mortality rate of up to 21%, but patients can have excellent prognosis with medical management without the need for invasive interventions.1 DM is the most common risk factor for EP and has been reported in up to 95% of patients with EP. Other common risk factors include urinary tract obstruction, female gender and age ≥60.2 The pathogenesis of EP is not completely understood, and it is considered multifactorial. The proposed mechanism is that high tissue glucose levels and poor blood supply to renal parenchyma in patients with diabetics facilitate the microenvironment for gas-forming pathogens.1 The most common bacteria to cause EP is Escherichia coli, followed by Proteus, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas and Enterococcus, which have also been reported as the causative microorganisms.2 Usual symptoms include nausea, vomiting, flank pain, dysuria and fever. CT scan is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosis and shows air in the renal parenchyma or surrounding tissues. Radiological findings help with the estimation of prognosis and guide therapy. Initial treatment includes resuscitation with intravenous fluids, empiric antibiotics to cover Gram-negative organisms (cephalosporin, fluoroquinolones, β-lactamase inhibitors etc), glycaemic control and maintaining systolic blood pressure above 100 mm Hg.2 Definitive treatment depends on the radiological findings and includes medical management with or without percutaneous drainage or percutaneous drainage and nephrectomy.3 Antibiotics should be switched based on final cultures and local antibiogram.
Emphysematous pyelonephritis is a urological emergency with a very high mortality rate if not managed timely. Usually, the patients respond well to the antibiotics if other contributing factors, especially a high blood glucose level, are managed well.
A high index of suspicion and a low threshold in performing imaging in patients with urinary tract infection and suspicion of pyelonephritis can result in an earlier diagnosis.
Our case also highlights that noncompliance to the diabetes mellitus treatment leading to poor glycaemic control can result in the recurrence of the disease in ipsilateral or contralateral kidney.
Contributors AW: drafted and revised the manuscript, MHH: drafted and revised the manuscript, AY: drafted and critically revised the manuscript, RT: drafted and revised the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.