Download PDFPDF
Anaplastic astrocytoma during pregnancy: the importance of an effective multidisciplinary approach
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Author's response to e-letter "Therapeutic strategy of Malignant glioma and the fetal-maternal wellbeing”
    • Valeria Filippi, Resident of the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics University Hospital Basel

    Thank you very much for your letter on our published case report of a pregnant woman that was diagnosed with a left parietal glioma in the 28th gestational week after a first generalised seizure, and for your opinion and thorough review of the literature.

    In our patient we performed a two-stage approach with first a tumour resection under general anaesthesia and preservation of the pregnancy and after caesarean section performed in the 37th gestational week an awake craniotomy for resection of residual tumour under neuropsychological monitoring and mapping.

    We decided to do a two-stage approach after a round table where obstetricians, neurosurgeons, anesthetists, neonatologists, and midwives were involved and after several long conversations with the patient and her husband. For the patient clearly the health of her unborn child was the most important aspect of her treatment and therefore she wanted to prolong the pregnancy until term. The tumor of our patient was located with a broad base to the surface and seemed to have a plane to the underlying white matter. There was no, in this location possible eloquent, unaffected cortex overlying the tumor. Moreover, our patient was already in the 28th gestational week of her pregnancy, the uterine fundus was high and the abdomen extended. The use of cortical or subcortical electric stimulation does increase the seizure risk1-4. Because of all these reasons we decided aga...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Therapeutic strategy of Malignant glioma and the fetal-maternal wellbeing
    • Kotoe Kamata, Assistant professor of Anesthesiology Tohoku University School of Medicine
    • Other Contributors:
      • Takashi Maruyama, Lecturer of Neurosurgery
      • Risa Fukushima, Assistant professor of Anesthesiology
      • Makoto Ozaki, Director of Primary Care Medicine

    Dear Dr. Biswas,
    In their recent article ‘Anaplastic astrocytoma during pregnancy: the importance of an effective multidisciplinary approach’, Filippi and colleagues described the therapeutic strategy for a pregnant patient whose left parietal glioma was discovered after a new-onset generalized seizure [1]. Following the multidisciplinary conference, they planned to attain a full-term pregnancy with staged tumor resection. First, the mass reduction was performed with neuronavigation and fluorescence-guided surgery using 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) under general anesthesia. Then awake craniotomy was planned for the residual tumor removal after delivery. Although the authors have provided excellent perioperative care for this complicated case, we have some reservations about the therapeutic strategy for malignant glioma in a pregnant patient.
    The guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gliomas, released by the European Association for Neuro-Oncology, present the following management options for newly diagnosed malignant glioma: resection or biopsy, followed by radiotherapy or chemotherapy (or combined modality treatment) [2]. In pregnant patients, the neurosurgical intervention for a malignant tumor is recommended regardless of gestational age, although the 32 week gestation point is generally used as the cutoff [3]. The extent of glioma resection is a decisive prognosis factor irrespective of tumor subtype [4]. In view of the absence of information on th...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.