Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Caesarean hysterectomy in a patient with placenta accreta spectrum disorders
Free
  1. Brahmana Askandar Tjokroprawiro
  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Brahmana Askandar Tjokroprawiro; brahmanaaskandar{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders is the abnormal invasion of the placenta to the myometrium.1 One of the risk factors of PAS is a previous caesarean section.2 Only few studies described caesarean hysterectomy in patients with PAS with images. We report a case of a caesarean hysterectomy in a 37-year-old pregnant woman previously diagnosed with PAS who visited the outpatient clinic at 31 weeks of gestation. The patient had undergone two previous caesarean sections. Ultrasonography showed total placenta previa with a high suspicion of PAS. She had no history of bleeding during prenatal care. When the patient reached term, she underwent a caesarean section with a hysterectomy. A midline incision was made for broader access. The lower segment of the uterus presented an atypical vascular pattern representing PAS (figure 1). A classical uterine incision was made to avoid the area, which presented an atypical vascular pattern. After the baby was delivered, the placenta was left in situ as the separation of the placenta from the uterus could have induced bleeding; this is the preferred management for PAS.2 Thus, caesarean hysterectomy was planned for this patient, and written informed consent was obtained prior to the surgical procedure.

Figure 1

A midline incision of the skin was performed, The lower segment of the uterus presented an atypical vascular pattern.

Before continuing with hysterectomy, the uterine wall was closed to minimise bleeding (figure 2). Thereafter, hysterectomy was performed and the specimen (figure 3) was sent to the pathology laboratory. Pathological examination of the uterus confirmed the diagnosis of PAS and showed that the placenta penetrated into the myometrium but not into the serosa of the uterus. The operative time was 70 min with a blood loss of 2000 mL, and the patient’s postoperative haemoglobin level was 8.8 g/dL (preoperative haemoglobin level: 11.5 g/dL). The patient did not require a blood transfusion, and she was discharged in good condition 4 days postoperatively. The patient’s newborn was healthy.

Figure 2

After the baby was delivered, the placenta was left in situ and uterine wall closure was performed before hysterectomy.

Figure 3

The uterus was sent for pathological examination, which confirmed the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.

The atypical vascular pattern of the uterus representing PAS is important for clinicians to have knowledge about, especially when handling referral patients, because the antenatal care history of the patients is unknown. This situation may occur in developing countries where an integrated national medical record is not established. If clinicians from a small hospital observe an atypical vascular pattern in the lower segment of the uterus during a caesarean section, the abdomen should be closed, and the patient should be referred to a tertiary hospital if the delivery of the baby can be postponed.

Patient’s perspective

Cases of placenta accreta spectrum disorders should be managed in a tertiary hospital, where appropriate facilities/medical devices and experienced specialists are available, so that women with conditions similar to mine and their babies will be safe.

Learning points

  • Previous caesarean section is a risk factor for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders.

  • Atypical vascular pattern in the lower segment of the uterus is a sign of PAS disorders, and the incision for caesarean section should not be made in this area to prevent bleeding from the placenta.

  • Closure of the uterine wall should be performed before hysterectomy to minimise bleeding, and caesarean hysterectomy must be performed with placenta in situ.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Acknowledgments

Dr Faroek Hoesin for histopathological examination.

References

Footnotes

  • Contributors BAT: Conceptualisation, drafting and editing.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.