Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy resulting in cardiogenic shock
  1. Paulina M Conradi,
  2. Ramon B van Loon and
  3. M Louis Handoko
  1. Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr M Louis Handoko; ml.handoko{at}


We report a case of a 73-year-old female patient, who was admitted to the coronary care unit due to chest pain, malaise and near syncope. During physical examination, the patient was hypotensive and there were signs of left-sided heart failure and a loud systolic murmur. Echocardiogram showed apical ballooning with dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, based on systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve with important mitral valve regurgitation. In the acute setting, the cardiogenic shock was treated cautiously with fluid resuscitation and intravenous metoprolol, resulting in direct stabilisation of her haemodynamic condition. As a codiagnosis, there was a significant stenosis of left anterior descending artery, which was treated successfully by percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents. During follow-up, left ventricular function normalised, and the left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, systolic anterior motion of mitral valve and related mitral regurgitation all resolved.

  • heart failure
  • interventional cardiology
  • valvar diseases
  • ultrasonography
  • ischaemic heart disease

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC) is an acute, reversible heart failure syndrome. The name Takotsubo is attributed to the shape of apical ballooning that resembles a Japanese octopus trap.1 This term was first described in Japan in 1990, but this syndrome was also described before and outside of Japan, only under different names.2 It mostly occurs in postmenopausal women. It seems to be triggered by sudden, unpredicted emotional or physical stress. The prevalence of TC in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is estimated around 1%–2%.3 It mimics an ACS by typical complaints, ECG abnormalities, elevated cardiac enzymes and transient regional ventricular wall motion abnormalities (WMA). Elevated systemic levels of catecholamines and stress-related neuropeptides seem to be the underlying pathogenesis of myocardial stunning.4 5

Due to its reversible character, TC was believed to be a benign condition. However, patients with TC can face serious complications, such as acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock, QT-prolongation and ventricular arrhythmias.5 Complications occur in approximately 18% and burden a substantial risk of mortality.6 Cardiogenic shock is frequently caused by dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO).3 The prevalence of LVOTO in TC is approximately 25% and its presence is determining for the treatment of shock.3 As the matter of fact, conventional therapy with inotropes and/or vasopressors, such as norepinephrine or epinephrine, may actually worsen LVOTO and can be fatal. Therefore, a fast diagnostic approach of the underlying mechanism of cardiogenic shock is of great importance. Here, we present a case of TC complicated by LVOTO and cardiogenic shock that was successfully stabilised with fluid therapy and intravenous beta-blocker.

Case presentation

A 73-year-old female patient with prior medical history of HIV, syphilis and cerebrovascular accident, presented herself to the coronary care unit with chest pain, near syncope and malaise. Furthermore, the patient was recently exposed to greater emotional distress. At presentation, the vital parameters were: blood pressure: 82/53 mm Hg, pulse rate: 81 beats/min (bpm), breathing frequency: 21/min with oxygen saturation: 94% with 3 L/min oxygen supply. Physical examination revealed a loud holosystolic murmur and bibasilar pulmonary rales.


The ECG showed diffusely subtle elevated ST segments and poor R-wave progression (figure 1). Cardiac enzymes were elevated (high-sensitive troponin T: 1380 ng/L). The kidney function was impaired (estimated glomerular filtration rate: 40 mL/min/1.73 m2). Chest X-ray showed pulmonary congestion. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) demonstrated a severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction with a dilated and akinetic apex, whereas the basal segments were hyperdynamic with a thick basal septum. Furthermore, there was a moderate-to-severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR), as well as systolic anterior movement (SAM) of the mitral valve causing a significant LVOTO (figure 2A-C; estimated intraventricular gradient: 40 mm Hg). In addition, coronary angiography revealed a hemodynamically significant stenosis at mid left anterior descending (LAD) artery (fractional flow reserve: 0.75), as well as a significant stenosis of the first diagonal branch. In absence of clinical ‘red flags’ for acute myocarditis (signs and/or symptoms of viral infection, elevated inflammatory parameters, pericardial effusion), no cardiac MRI was performed, in accordance to the 2018 InterTAK diagnostic flow chart.7

Figure 1

ECG at presentation: subtle and diffusely elevated ST segment without reciprocal depression, poor R-wave progression and borderline prolonged QTc-interval (468 ms).

Figure 2

Transthoracic echocardiogram: apical five-chamber view. (A) (inset) apical ballooning, basal septal hypercontractility and systolic anterior movement of mitral valve. (B) Moderate-to-severe mitral valve regurgitation and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (turbulent flow). (C) Estimated intraventricular gradient of 40 mm Hg with a peak velocity across the left ventricular outflow tract of 3.2 m/s. (D) Immediately after intravenous beta-blocker treatment: a significant reduction in mitral valve regurgitation, in combination with (E) a drop in left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (peak velocity 1.4 m/s, estimated intraventricular gradient <10 mm Hg).

Differential diagnosis

Based on the above findings, the diagnosis was cardiogenic shock due to LVOTO. TC was perceived to be the most probable underlying cause, with a reported stressful event, an ECG without signs of transmural ischaemia and extensive WMA that could not fully explained by a (proximal) lesion of the LAD artery. For the same reasons, ACS was considered less likely. Also, there were no signs of papillary muscle rupture that might have caused acute MR and shock, neither evidence for severe aortic valve stenosis. Even though the echocardiogram displayed a thick basal septum, it did not show any other diagnostic criteria of a hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. A viral myocarditis was not likely due to an atypical anamnesis and low inflammatory parameters.


In order to stabilise the patient, she was cautiously treated with 0.5 L in 1 hour intravenous saline fluid in order to optimise LV filling conditions, despite signs of left-sided heart failure. Although there was a modest initial rise in blood pressure, her oxygen saturation dropped despite additional oxygen supplementation, and therefore the intravenous drip was stopped. Next to volume therapy, per 1 mg to a total of 10 mg, metoprolol was administered intravenously. The haemodynamic parameters improved with every milligram of metoprolol, as seen during monitoring with an arterial line. Before the start of intravenous treatment with beta-blockers, the vital parameters were: blood pressure 94/47 mm Hg, pulse rate 92 bpm, oxygen saturation of 92%. Within half an hour, the blood pressure increased to 129/63 mm Hg, the pulse rate lowered to 65 bpm, whereas oxygen saturation increased to 95%. A TTE was performed directly after intravenous metoprolol treatment (figure 2D,E). LV outflow tract velocity reduced to 1.4 m/s and the estimated intraventricular gradient dropped to 8 mm Hg. In addition, SAM and related MR resolved as well. Metoprolol 50 mg two times per day was then continued orally. Two drug eluting stents were placed in mid-LAD with optimal result, the first diagonal branch was treated conservatively (figure 3). During hospitalisation, pharmacological treatment for heart failure and coronary artery disease (CAD) was optimised.

Figure 3

Coronary angiography. (A) Haemodynamically significant stenosis of mid-left anterior descending artery and first diagonal branch. (B) After stent placement with good angiographic result.

Outcome and follow-up

The TTE, which was repeated 2 days after start of beta-blockers, already displayed an improvement of LV function and further reduction in MR, as well as the complete disappearance of SAM. Also, subsequent ECG showed the deep negative T-waves with QT-prolonging, which fits to the natural ECG-evolution of TC (figure 4). At discharge, the QTc-interval was normalised and the negative T-waves were less prominent. Patient was discharged home in a stable cardiac condition. At 6 weeks follow-up, she was doing well and the TTE showed a good LV function with only mild MR and no signs of LVOTO. Basal septal thickness was 13 mm. In retrospect, this may explain why the LVOTO was particularly severe in this patient.

Figure 4

ECG 2 days after first presentation with deep negative T-waves and QT-prolongation (QTc: 496 ms).


An obstruction of the LV outflow tract is most common in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but also frequently seen in TC. The underlying pathophysiological mechanism is hypercontractility of the LV basal segments that leads to a Venturi-effect by systolic narrowing of the LV outflow tract with occurrence of SAM with secondary MR. Due to manifestation of LVOTO that hinders ejection, this condition is the most serious and challenging complication to manage.

With the use of TTE, this condition can be quickly diagnosed. The detection of LVOTO is important because the treatment of shock depends on the presence of LVOTO. Standard treatment of shock could even be fatal: inotropic agents may increase the LV pressure gradient due to stimulating contractility, therefore worsening of the SAM and MR, resulting in exacerbation of obstruction.8 Vasopressors, such as norepinephrine or epinephrine are also counterproductive in TC, as they are thought to further activate the catecholamine-related pathways. Vasopressin, on the other hand, increases peripheral vascular resistance using different pathways, and could be considered in this scenario. Other pharmacological agents that are indicated in acute heart failure/pulmonary oedema, such as vasodilators (eg, nitroglycerine, diuretics), are counterproductive as well, due to reduction of preload and afterload.7 Instead, LVOTO should be managed similarly to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Beta-blockers and volume therapy are indicated in order to lessen basal hypercontractility and to prolong diastole with greater end-diastolic volume. This results in widening of LVOT and therefore decreasing obstruction, elevating arterial pressure and downgrading MR, as seen in our case and of others.9–11 There are no randomised trials that back-up these measures, with only a few supporting case reports and case-controlled studies.9 12 13 Santoro and colleagues showed that esmolol infusion in nine patients with TC and LVOTO resulted in a reduction of LVOT pressure gradient (before treatment: 48±17 mm Hg, after: 18±2 mm Hg; p<0.01).13 Even though there were signs of left-sided decompensation in the form of pulmonary congestion, we carefully administered saline intravenously, which resulted in some beneficial effect on blood pressure. The ultimate bail-out measure to stabilise the cardiac condition in LVOTO would have been LV mechanical support, such as Impella.7 14 This was fortunately not necessary in our case, due to rapid stabilisation of the cardiac condition after fluid resuscitation and intravenous metoprolol.

Although TC is believed to be a benign condition, the long-term rates of mortality and recurrence in patients are not insignificant and resemble those of ACS. A meta-analysis of 4679 patients with TC showed an annual rate of mortality of 3.5% and a recurrence rate of 1.0%.15 However, the prognosis of shock in TC due to LVOTO seems to be favourable with the adequate treatment.12

Another interesting aspect of this case is the combined ischaemic and stress-induced origin of the cardiomyopathy. Although non-obstructive CAD is common in patients with TC, the association between TC and obstructive CAD/ACS should not be missed since ischaemia may also trigger TC.16 The coexistence of obstructive CAD in patients with TC is 15% and therefore quite frequent.17 In the current diagnostic criteria of InterTAK, obstructive CAD is no longer an exclusion criteria for the diagnosis of TC.4 In these patients, the diagnosis is based on the extend of regional WMA beyond the territory supplied by a single coronary artery, as well as the recovery of the cardiomyopathy within days or weeks, as in our case. Imaging techniques, like cardiac magnetic resonance could help to differentiate between TC and ACS or myocarditis, although it is less suitable in an acute setting.4 In patients with ACS and cardiomyopathy due to myocarditis, characteristic late gadolinium enhancement is seen on cardiac MRI, whereas it is mostly absent in TC.18 The clinical course and prognosis of TC and ACS display profound differences when presented with cardiogenic shock. Vallabhajosyula and colleagues demonstrated that patients in cardiogenic shock with TC received a cardiac catheterisation earlier than patients with ACS.19 Furthermore, TC was associated with higher rates of acute respiratory insufficiency, likely due to more extensive WMA and additional right ventricular dysfunction. Nevertheless, in-hospital mortality was lower in TC with cardiogenic shock compared with ACS, which might be explained by the reversible nature of TC, younger age and fewer comorbidities in these patients.

In conclusion, cardiogenic shock can be a severe complication in patients with TC, which has to be diagnosed quickly in order to choose the right treatment to rapidly stabilise this critical condition. Beta-blockers and volume therapy have a good effect on vital parameters in this precarious situation, whereas inotropes and most vasopressors may be detrimental. However, bedside echocardiographic monitoring is mandatory. The coexistence of obstructive CAD does not exclude TC as a diagnosis, but should be further investigated.

Patient’s perspective

The time I was admitted to the hospital, I was in a very stressful period of my life due to personal and family problems. On that particular day, I was Nordic Walking with my group. Quickly, I felt very exhausted. But I continued walking, even though it was difficult to keep up. After the walk I biked home, when suddenly I felt pain in the gastric area and left arm. Therefore, I went to the general practitioner. There, they advised me to take the double dosage of stomach protectors and I got discharged. But at that time my body felt really heavy, like it was drawn to the ground. My son advised me to go to the emergency room, where they took me in and did various tests. Eventually, I got transferred to the cardiac care unit. I never thought it was my heart that was the cause of my symptoms. I was surrounded by a resident and a cardiologist and they told me it was Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, the ‘broken heart’ syndrome. The treatment would consist of pills and resting, which sounded very magical to me. With a lot of care and close monitoring, the doctors gave me a beta-blocker and fluid infusion, which resulted in a lower heart rate. Very soon after, I felt much better and relieved. I cannot remember whether I felt scared at that moment. That fear came later, when I realised that I had a heart failure syndrome. I thought that I could never work in the garden again, but then a cardiologist told me, ‘I bet you will soon be able to do it again’. I also got two stents due to a narrowed vessel. At discharge, I was scared to go home. But during revalidation, I recovered, as well did my heart function. I am happy because I do not have any complaints anymore.

Learning points

  • Presentation with cardiogenic shock is a severe complication of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy that is often caused by dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. It should be diagnosed quickly due to consequences of treatment. Bedside echocardiography plays an essential role.

  • In case of cardiogenic shock and presence of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, treatment of cardiogenic shock with inotropes and most vasopressors, such as norepinephrine or epinephrine, are counterproductive. Treatment consists of beta-blockers and volume therapy, even though it may seem counterintuitive.

  • Takotsubo cardiomyopathy can be accompanied by ischaemic origin of cardiomyopathy due to obstructive coronary artery disease.



  • Contributors PMC and MLH were the treating doctors of the patient. PMC and MLH substantially contributed to the conception or design of the work. PMC, MLH and RBvL contributed to drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content. PMC, MLH and RBvL contributed to final approval of the version to be published. PMC, MLH, RBvL contributed to agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolve


  • Funding This study was funded by Hartstichting (MLH: E.Dekker Senior Clinical Scientist (2020T058)).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.