Jump to comment:

• Consistent messaging in airway emergencies
  Angela L Gardner, Nick Calder and Brendan A McGrath
  Published on: 12 March 2021

• Published on: 12 March 2021

  Consistent messaging in airway emergencies

  • Angela L Gardner, Clinical Fellow in Intensive Care Medicine Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
  • Other Contributors:
    • Nick Calder, ENT Consultant and Clinical Lead
    • Brendan A McGrath, Consultant in Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine

  We thank Dr Yap and colleagues for describing clearly the successful management of an unexpectedly challenging airway.1 We agree that the index case highlights the need for vigilance in all patients requiring airway management, particularly where an atypical presentation of a respiratory condition may indicate occult airway pathology.2 However, the case raises a number of important issues for airway assessment, intubation-related laryngeal pathology and the management of ‘can’t intubate, can’t ventilate’ scenarios which warrant further discussion, considered below.

  Airway assessment can be encapsulated by the quote, “Hindsight is a wonderful thing but foresight is better, especially when it comes to saving life,” attributed the 19th Century English poet William Blake. Whilst subtle, there were a number of clues in the described case report that could, and perhaps should, have prompted a more thorough evaluation of the airway. It is surprising that the patient did not report their extreme prematurity at birth, or the fact that they spent the first year of their life in hospital. This would have almost certainly have involved prolonged ventilation and sequelae into childhood. Respiratory and airway complications are well recognised in premature neonates and may coexist.3 The authors highlight the Difficult Airway Society’s airway algorithms and the fact that any clinician managing an airway should prepare for failure.4-6 This should involve an examination of the front...

  Show More

  We thank Dr Yap and colleagues for describing clearly the successful management of an unexpectedly challenging airway.1 We agree that the index case highlights the need for vigilance in all patients requiring airway management, particularly where an atypical presentation of a respiratory condition may indicate occult airway pathology.2 However, the case raises a number of important issues for airway assessment, intubation-related laryngeal pathology and the management of ‘can’t intubate, can’t ventilate’ scenarios which warrant further discussion, considered below.

  Airway assessment can be encapsulated by the quote, “Hindsight is a wonderful thing but foresight is better, especially when it comes to saving life,” attributed the 19th Century English poet William Blake. Whilst subtle, there were a number of clues in the described case report that could, and perhaps should, have prompted a more thorough evaluation of the airway. It is surprising that the patient did not report their extreme prematurity at birth, or the fact that they spent the first year of their life in hospital. This would have almost certainly have involved prolonged ventilation and sequelae into childhood. Respiratory and airway complications are well recognised in premature neonates and may coexist.3 The authors highlight the Difficult Airway Society’s airway algorithms and the fact that any clinician managing an airway should prepare for failure.4-6 This should involve an examination of the front of the neck, in case an emergency surgical airway is required. This may have revealed the tracheostomy scar, noted during the evolving airway crisis. Although we recognise that these scars often heal very well after childhood tracheostomy and may not always be visible.

  Any previous intubation of the trachea is associated with a risk of laryngeal injury and dysfunction occurring even after a short general anaesthetic.7 Clinical symptoms of hoarseness, breathiness (audible breathing), stridor, vocal fatigue or even ‘shortness of breath’ may indicate significant occult laryngeal pathology, including arytenoid fibrosis or dislocation, vocal cord paralysis or (sub)glottic stenosis.8 Even without the full disclosure of the preterm birth and likely prolonged intubation/ventilation, the history of intensive care unit admission in childhood is potentially significant, particularly when combined with the ongoing symptoms.

  Lastly, the international language around what constitutes a “can’t intubate, can’t ventilate” scenario and, more importantly, what to do about it is well established. Dr Yap and colleagues describe appropriate initial actions following a failure to intubate the trachea: the patient could be ventilated and therefore oxygenated throughout via the use of a supraglottic airway device. Whilst we commend the authors for highlighting a stepwise approach to managing an evolving airway crisis, two important points need clarification. Repeated laryngoscopy and attempted intubation of the trachea (five in this case) are: increasingly likely to fail; will lead to trauma, bleeding and oedema; and risk provoking catastrophic airway obstruction and subsequent failure of ventilation and oxygenation.9 Furthermore, should a ‘can’t intubate, can’t ventilate’ scenario become apparent, the most appropriate course of action is an immediate cricothyroidotomy, not a tracheostomy which takes significantly longer and requires considerable surgical expertise which may not be immediately available.10 Therefore, we are concerned that the take home message from this report is potentially confusing. The authors rightly point out that different approaches to emergency cricothyroidotomy are debated, but we strongly recommend that the final learning point from their report is that a ‘can’t intubate, can’t ventilate’ scenario should be dealt with immediately, by whoever is managing the airway, by performing emergency scalpel-bougie cricothyroidotomy.10 Waiting for an ENT surgeon, who may not be immediately available, to attend may cause life threatening delay. Reinforcing this message consistently and supporting airway practitioners with appropriate training should reduce the potentially catastrophic outcomes associated with difficult and failed airway management.

   
  References

  1. Yap T, Quick M, Moore P. Emergency tracheostomy for failed intubation due to glottic stenosis. BMJ Case Rep 2021;14(2) doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-239806 [published Online First: 2021/02/28]
  2. Garini G, Fecci L, Giacosa R, et al. Adult idiopathic subglottic stenosis: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Ann Ital Med Int 2004;19(1):54-7. [published Online First: 2004/06/05]
  3. Jones M. Effect of preterm birth on airway function and lung growth. Paediatr Respir Rev 2009;10 Suppl 1:9-11. doi: 10.1016/S1526-0542(09)70005-3 [published Online First: 2009/08/11]
  4. Higgs A, Cook TM, McGrath BA. Airway management in the critically ill: the same, but different. British journal of anaesthesia 2016;117 Suppl 1:i5-i9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew055
  5. Higgs A, McGrath BA, Goddard C, et al. Guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults. British journal of anaesthesia 2018;120(2):323-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.021
  6. Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, et al. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. British journal of anaesthesia 2015;115(6):827-48. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev371
  7. Mota L, de Cavalho G, Brito V. Laryngeal Complications by Orotracheal Intubation: Literature Review. International archives of otorhinolaryngology 2012;16(2):236-45. doi: 10.7162/S1809-97772012000200014
  8. Ponfick M, Linden R, Nowak D. Dysphagia--a Common, Transient Symptom in Critical Illness Polyneuropathy: A Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing Study. Critical care medicine 2015;43(2):365-72. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000705
  9. Mort TC. Emergency Tracheal Intubation: Complications Associated with Repeated Laryngoscopic Attempts. 2004
  10. Pracy JP, Brennan L, Cook TM, et al. Surgical intervention during a Can't intubate Can't Oxygenate (CICO) Event: Emergency Front-of-neck Airway (FONA)? British journal of anaesthesia 2016;117(4):426-28. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew221 [published Online First: 2016/09/21]

  Show Less

  Conflict of Interest:
  None declared.

  • Back to top