Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Sumatriptan dose increase-induced acute angle closure glaucoma in chronic migraine sufferer
  1. Sokratis Zormpas1,
  2. Artemis Matsou1,
  3. Diandra Monique Antunes2 and
  4. Chris Panos3
  1. 1Ophthalmology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  2. 2General Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
  3. 3Ophthalmology, Epsom and Saint Helier Hospital NHS Trust, Carshalton, Sutton, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sokratis Zormpas; sokratis-zor{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

In this case study, we explore a case of bilateral acute angle closure (AAC) attack detected in a 52-year-old female patient with no other ophthalmic background or predisposition to angle closure, following an increase of her regular sumatriptan dose used for migraine relief. Even though the initial presentation was misinterpreted as migraine attack, it nevertheless alerted the treating physicians to immediate cessation of the drug, allowing for the pertinent ocular symptomatology to be unveiled. Drug-induced bilateral AAC is a rare occurrence and can lead to significant ocular morbidity if not detected and treated early. Clinicians of emergency care should be aware of this uncommon association, as prompt ophthalmology input is vital. Interestingly, although it would be anticipated that people prone to angle closure attack after sumatriptan intake would exhibit symptoms after initiation of the drug, our patient suffered an attack while on long-term treatment and following dose increase.

  • glaucoma
  • anterior chamber

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors We all contributed to the writing of this case report and declare there are no competing interests from any of the authors. SZ and AM gathered the initial data and wrote the initial abstract while DMA wrote the initial draft of the article and the discussion. We were all involved in discussion regarding planning of the overall article and layout. Following editing the abstract with SZ and AM, CP reviewed the article and did a final edit before submission.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.