Article Text
Abstract
This is a case of a 73-year-old woman who first presented in 2020 with a fullness in her abdomen. After several thorough investigations and unforeseen complications, the fullness was diagnosed as a granulosa cell tumour. In 2003, she had been diagnosed with a granulosa cell tumour of the ovary. Complete excision was performed, however she was not given a follow-up appointment after the procedure. This case highlights the importance of frequent follow-up of these tumours, the high recurrence rate, the severe complications which may result and the awareness of possible variations in this tumour’s histologic appearance.
- gynecological cancer
- pathology
- general surgery
- healthcare improvement and patient safety
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors TA assumed the role of guarantor and came up with the idea of writing the article. She formed part of the caring firm and was also involved in the patient’s management. She helped in gaining the patient’s consent to submit the case report to the BMJ and helped in researching literature and composing the case report. MG formed part of the caring firm and was also involved in the patient’s management. She helped in gaining the patient’s consent to submit the case report to the BMJ and helped in researching literature and composing the case report. She also helped in obtaining and editing the CT scan slices used for the report. DF also formed part of the caring firm. He helped in gaining the patient’s consent to submit the case report to the BMJ and helped in researching literature and composing the case report. He also formatted the report according to the BMJ guidelines. DB reviewed the histological samples and gave the final diagnosis of granulosa cell tumour. He contributed to the write-up by researching papers regarding granulosa cell tumour histology and providing photos and descriptions of the slides. All the authors are affiliated with Mater Dei Hospital in Malta.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.