Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
A 45-year-old man, with poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c-10.1), presented with fever and gluteal pain for 3 days. On examination, there was a swelling over left gluteal region with induration and an overlying discharging sinus. Ultrasonography of the swelling showed subcutaneous oedema with underlying collection. Incision and drainage was done and the pus was sent for bacteriological, tubercular, fungal stains and culture. Gram stain showed gram positive cocci in clusters and subsequently there was growth of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, for which the patient was started on linezolid. Two days later, the patient developed new-onset cough with shortness of breath. A chest radiograph was done which showed bilateral nodular densities with cavitation (figure 1). Subsequently, a high-resolution CT of chest showed multiple cavitating nodules along with feeding vessel sign and bilateral pleural effusion (figure 2). There was no any evidence of peripheral thrombophlebitis. A two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography was also done, which did not show any evidence of infective endocarditis. With the given radiological picture, a differentials of septic pulmonary emboli (SPE), pulmonary vasculitis, pulmonary infections(tubercular or fungal) and metastatic lesions were kept. Potassium hydroxide (KOH) stain and fungal cultures from respiratory samples were negative. Sputum sent for acid-fast bacilli and GeneXpert was also negative. There was no associated cervical, mediastinal lymphadenopathy or discernible mass. The clinical picture and duration of illness was not suggestive of pulmonary vasculitis and antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody was also negative. With the given clinical scenario and imaging findings a final diagnosis of gluteal abscess with SPE was made and the patient was managed with intravenous antibiotics for 4 weeks to which the patient showed steady improvement.
SPE are caused by embolisation of thrombi containing micro-organisms to pulmonary vascular beds causing infarctions and microabscesses.1 Common causes of SPE include infective endocarditis, skin and soft-tissues infection, intravascular catheters, pacemakers, intravenous drug use, dental abscess, septic thrombophlebitis, puerperal sepsis, etc.2–5 The characteristic radiological finding on CT scan is bilateral discrete nodules with varying degrees of cavitation; the nodules may differ in size reflecting recurrent embolic showers.6 Other findings include subpleural wedge-shaped opacities and feeding vessel sign (a distinct vessel leading directly to a nodule), which is considered to be pathognomic of SPE.7 Pleural effusion or empyema may occasionally complicate SPE. Radiological features of SPE can mimic other conditions like pulmonary vasculitis (granulomatosis with polyangiitis), extrathoracic metastasis (commonly squamous cell carcinoma) and pulmonary thromboembolism.8 9 The duration as well as clinical manifestations serves as important pointers in the etiological diagnosis of this condition. Rapidly evolving clinical picture with cavity (<12 weeks) is seen in infectious aetiology while chronic or indolent (>12 weeks) duration is more suggestive of malignancy or vasculitis.10 11 Finding the underlying cause followed by appropriate treatment is crucial for management.
In all patient with septic pulmonary embolic, the primary cause must be evaluated and addressed.
Radiological features of septic pulmonary embolic may mimic other conditions like pulmonary vasculitis, extrathoracic metastasis from head and neck (commonly squamous cell carcinoma) and pulmonary thromboembolism.
Patient consent for publication
Contributors SS and AR contributed to the design and writing the manuscript. SS and AR both were involved in patient care.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.