Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Oral hamartoma with an advanced elevation of the tongue
Free
  1. Yuka Yamada1,
  2. Hajime Okita2,
  3. Taneaki Nakagawa1 and
  4. Seiji Asoda1
  1. 1Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
  2. 2Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
  1. Correspondence to Dr Seiji Asoda; asoda{at}keio.jp

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Description

A 4-year-old boy was referred from another hospital without a paediatric department, having the swelling of the tongue, snoring and pronunciation difficulty for the past roughly 10 months. His birth had been uneventful, and he had no remarkable medical history. A tumour was noted on right floor of the mouth, with a little resistance, smooth surface and normal colour (figure 1). His tongue was extremely elevated, causing a speech disorder, uncontrollable dropping of saliva and issues chewing; however, no pain or respiratory distress was apparent. MRI showed heterogeneously contrast enhancement and a mixture of hypointense and hyperintense signals onT1-weighted and T2-weighted imaging (figure 2). Suspecting sarcoma, we conducted a biopsy under general anaesthesia, noting no complications, including bleeding and airway trouble. The lesion was suspected to be a hamartoma, therefore, we performed transoral tumour excision under general anaesthesia, while paying careful attention to the salivary duct. We were able to easily peel the tumour from the oral mucosa and tongue, which was firm. The tumour measured 50×42×35 mm and had a thin, fibrous membrane (figure 3A). Its cross-section of tumour showed white, yellow and brown structures. Microscopically, there were mainly some mature adipose islands admixed with collagenous stroma and skeletal muscle. Ossification, calcification and smooth muscle fibres were observed very slightly (figure 4A–C). On immunohistochemistry, desmin positivity was detected in the skeletal muscle bundles (figure 4D). Desmin was also positive in small spindle cells. No epithelium or central nervous system findings were observed, nor was any positivity for AE1/AE3, CK, EMA or MIC2 detected. There were no immature elements or malignancy. These results confirmed the diagnosis of hamartoma. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged the following day after uneventful airway observation (figure 3B). There has been no recurrence of the lesion in the 4 years since excision (figure 5).

Figure 1

Photograph at the first visit. The tumour (blue arrows) was about 60 mm in size, located on the right floor of the mouth and elevating the tongue (yellow arrows).

Figure 2

(A) T1-weighted MRI. (B) T2-weighted MRI. (C) Contrast-enhanced, fat-suppressed T1-weighted MRI. The lesion placed extreme pressure on its origin (the tongue) and had clear margins.

Figure 3

(A) Photograph at the excision. The tumour was covered with a slight membrane and was easily peeled from the oral mucosa and tongue. (B) Photograph after the excision.

Figure 4

(A–C) H&E staining results. There were mature adipose islands, skeletal muscle and ossification and calcification. (D) Immuonohistochemical positivity for desmin.

Figure 5

Photograph at 4 years after the excision. There has been no problem for the movement of the tongue.

Hamartoma is defined as a tumour-like malformation composed of a focal overgrowth of mature normal cells which were native to the organ of its origin.1 It is a congenital lesion and usually asymptomatic, being detected as an incidental mass. Oral hamartoma is rare, and most of cases occur in young children, located on the tongue or the anterior palate. Forty-five oral hamartomas were reported in PubMed from 1990 to 2020 and two of them were located sublingually and one of those was as large as the one described in the present patient.2 In our H&E examination, the skeletal muscles bundles had proliferated, with only slight ossification and calcification observed. Ossification was also found in the aforementioned large hamartoma. Because of no abnormality such as cleft palate or bifid tongue, the aetiology of the present tumour was unknown. Painless lesions located on the inner surface may be undetected by patients until growing up. Generally, hamartomas do not recur, but the present tumour was quite large and histologically varied, so multiple mesenchymal cells may have been potentially present. We continue our observations every 6 months to detect any recurrence.

Learning points

  • Young children tend not to complain of abnormalities, so we should be alert for symptoms such as snoring and pronunciation difficulty.

  • When we treat for giant oral tumour, we should check for airway trouble and assess the oral function.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

References

Footnotes

  • Contributors YY: treated the patient, drafted the manuscript. HO: diagnosed the pathology, drafted the manuscript. TN: drafted the manuscript. SA: treated the patient, drafted the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.