Statistics from Altmetric.com
A 30-year-old woman with a 20-year history of bronchial asthma that had been managed with inhaled budesonide and formoterol as needed came with 1-week history of cough, fever and right-sided chest pain. She had normal oxygen saturation while breathing ambient air and was not in respiratory distress. Physical examination was notable for bronchial breath sounds and crackles over right mammary region.
A frontal radiograph of the chest (figure 1) showed airspace opacity in the right lower lung zone. The right heart border is lost and the right dome of diaphragm is well seen, indicating right middle lobe (RML) involvement (silhouette sign). On the other hand, if the right heart border is well seen and the lung opacity obscures the right dome of diaphragm, then the lesion must be in the right lower lobe. The findings were confirmed with CT of chest. (figure 2)
The normal silhouette (outline) of heart and diaphragm can be well seen because of the contrast that exists between the denser cardiac structures (white) and less dense adjacent lung tissue (black). When a part of lung which is adjacent to heart (eg, RML) is consolidated then its density becomes same as that of heart and it cannot be seen separately from the heart. This is called the Silhouette sign. Dr Benjamin Felson coined the term silhouette sign after reasoning that, “An intrathoracic lesion touching a border of the heart, aorta, or diaphragm will obliterate that border. An intrathoracic lesion not anatomically contiguous with a border of one of these structures will not obliterate that border.”1–3
The patient was discharged after 10 days of antibiotic therapy (moxifloxacin) and was doing well at a follow-up visit 2 weeks after discharge.
The silhouette sign results from the juxtaposition of structures of similar radiographic density.
The sign is used not only to identify normal chest structures but also to localise lung diseases.
We acknowledge the department of Radiology for providing chest X-ray and CT chest images.
Contributors SPM and CTR wrote the draft of the manuscript. RVA involved in patient management. SS revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the literature review and approved the final manuscript for submission.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Obtained.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.