Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Case report
Conundrum of aortic stenosis in a case of multivalvular rheumatic heart disease: perspicuity is in the details
  1. Ahamed Shaheer Ahmed1,
  2. Rahul Kumar1 and
  3. Aseem Basha2
  1. 1Cardiology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
  2. 2Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Aseem Basha; draseembasha{at}gmail.com

Abstract

A 36-year-old woman presented with dyspnoea on exertion for 5 years. She was evaluated elsewhere and diagnosed to have severe mitral stenosis. She was referred for mitral valve replacement to our centre. Echocardiography revealed a thickened aortic valve with mild aortic regurgitation, with transaortic gradient suggestive of mild aortic stenosis, in addition to severe rheumatic mitral stenosis. Detailed echocardiographic analysis and cardiac catheterisation revealed features suggestive of moderate to severe aortic stenosis. Detailed assessment of aortic valve needs to be done in patients with coexistent mitral stenosis. Each modality for assessment of aortic stenosis has its own limitations and a decision regarding treatment needs to be taken based on combined analysis of all the parameters. Dimensionless velocity index is a relatively less time-consuming, flow independent measure of aortic stenosis. Prompt recognition of this concealed aortic stenosis helps to avoid repeat valve surgery. Subsequently, patient was sent for dual valve replacement.

  • cardiovascular medicine
  • valvar diseases

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors ASA and RK contributed equally in patient care and preparing the manuscript. AB had done initial echocardiography, conceptualised the manuscript and gave the final approval to the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.