Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Case report
Symptomatic digoxin toxicity in a patient on haemodialysis
  1. Lara Delicata1,
  2. Arlène Gatt2,
  3. Jean-Luc Paris2 and
  4. John Bonello3
  1. 1Department of Nephrology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
  2. 2Department of Medicine, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
  3. 3Department of Cardiology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
  1. Correspondence to Dr Lara Delicata; lara.callus{at}gov.mt

Abstract

We present a man undergoing regular haemodialysis sessions, who presented with non-specific symptoms of nausea, vomiting and light-headedness. He was found to have significantly raised serum digoxin concentrations, as well as a heart rate of 30 beats per minutes. An ECG showed complete heart block. He has a history of non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy with resistant supraventricular and ventricular tachycardias and was on concomitant beta-blockade and digoxin. On questioning, he reported a gradual decline in his residual urine output over the past 6 months. He was reviewed by the cardiology team and required both pharmacological therapy for reversal of digoxin toxicity and temporary pacing in view of significant bradyarrhythmias. The beta-blockade and digoxin were discontinued. He was kept on continuous monitoring at the Cardiac Critical Care Unit. His symptoms resolved spontaneously once digoxin-specific antibody fragments were administered and temporary pacing successfully performed.

  • arrhythmias
  • renal system
  • dialysis
  • toxicology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors LD was responsible for the writing and editing of the manuscript. AG was responsible for collecting data from medical records, consenting the patient and revising the manuscript. JP was responsible for obtaining informed consent and revising the manuscript. JB was responsible for revising the manuscript and selecting appropriate figures for the report.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.