Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Five biopsies, one diagnosis: challenges in idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease
  1. Julie Semenchuk1,
  2. Asad Merchant2,
  3. Ali Sakhdari3 and
  4. Vishal Kukreti4
  1. 1Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  4. 4Department of Medicine, Medical Oncology & Hematology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Julie Semenchuk; julie.semenchuk{at}mail.utoronto.ca

Abstract

A previously healthy 29-year-old man initially presented to the hospital with pleuritic chest pain and shortness of breath. Over the next 2 months he developed ongoing fevers and night sweats with recurrent exudative pleural effusions and ascites. He had an extensive infectious and autoimmune workup that was unremarkable. He had an initial lymph node biopsy that showed reactive changes only. He had an acute kidney injury and his renal biopsy revealed thrombotic microangiopathy. His liver biopsy showed non-specific inflammatory changes. His bone marrow biopsy showed megakaryocyte hyperplasia and fibrosis, which raised suspicion for the thrombocytopenia, ascites, reticulin fibrosis, renal dysfunction and organomegaly syndrome subtype of multicentric Castleman disease. This prompted a repeat lymph node biopsy, showing changes consistent with mixed type Castleman disease that fit with his clinical picture. He was initiated on steroids and siltuximab with significant clinical improvement.

  • haematology (incl blood transfusion)
  • renal medicine
  • pathology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @doc_merc

  • Contributors JS was responsible for writing the complete manuscript draft and revising it. AM was responsible for critically revising the work, providing guidance regarding which content to include as well as approving the final draft. AS was responsible for critically revising the work, providing pathology slides and approving the final draft. VK was responsible for critically revising the work, providing guidance regarding which content to include as well as approving the final draft.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.