Statistics from Altmetric.com
A 23-year-old woman presented to the emergency department for severe abdominal pain and vomiting over the last 12 hours. She reported that she was on the second day of her menstrual period and was taking oral contraceptives. The patient was suffering and upset. Vital signs were stable; no fever. On physical examination, abdomen was distended, tender, bowel sounds and function were normal and Blumberg’s sign was positive. The rest of the examination was unremarkable. A blood test was performed and showed neutrophilic leucocytosis (white blood cells 14 61×109/L, N 12 63×109/L) and a slight increase in C reactive protein (0.87 mg/dL). Pregnancy test was sent. She was started on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and proton pump inhibitor. Gynaecological referral was requested but, in the meanwhile, an abdominal X-ray showed the presence of a fetus in the abdomen (figure 1). An abdominal ultrasound confirmed the presence of a vital fetus. The unaware father was called by the medical staff in order to be informed about the paternity. On gynaecological examination, full cervical dilatation was noted, so the woman was urgently admitted to labour ward where the baby was spontaneously delivered 10 hours later at 38 weeks clinical gestational age. The baby had a normal transition to extrauterine life with an Apgar score of 8 at 1 min and 9 at 5 min, and a weight of 3180 g. Imaging studies are crucial in the diagnostic evaluation of significant medical conditions. The use of X-ray has become so common in medicine that it may be performed inadvertently before the diagnosis of pregnancy. Fetal exposure to ionising radiation is associated with a higher risk of anomalies, growth restriction or abortion for the fetus. The fetal risk is higher if radiation exposure occurs during the first trimester of gestation and at extremely high dose. However, according to The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee, with a few exceptions, the dose of radiation exposure through radiography is much lower than the dose associated with teratogenesis. Although ultrasonography and MRI are the imaging techniques of choice for the pregnant patients, the ACOG Committee states that, if necessary or more readily available, X-ray should be performed.1
With a few exceptions, the dose of radiation exposure through radiography is much lower than the dose associated with teratogenesis.
The risk to a fetus from ionising radiation is higher if radiation exposure occurs during early embryogenesis and at extremely high dose.
If necessary or more readily available for diagnosis, radiography should not be withheld from a pregnant patient.
Contributors MCDN: drafting, creation and revision of case report. CM: acquisition of information, drafting and interpretation. ER: acquisition of information, drafting and review. FN: overview and critical revision for important intellectual content.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Obtained.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.