Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Neurocutaneous melanosis: a rare manifestation of congenital melanocytic nevus
Free
  1. Joshua H Lee1,
  2. Andrew B Jackson1,
  3. Yawen Ren1 and
  4. Kavya Indira Rao2
  1. 1 Paediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
  2. 2 Child Neurology, Children’s Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Kavya Indira Rao, kirao4{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

A newborn baby presented with a large melanocytic nevus covering the suprapubic, inguinal and thigh regions as well as numerous satellite lesions on the torso, shoulders and legs (figure 1). MRI of the brain demonstrated areas of T1 and T2 hyperintensity within the bilateral hippocampi, choroid plexus and left cerebellum (figure 2). MRI of the spine revealed a small T1 hyperintense nodule along the cauda equina at the L2 level (figure 2). Lumbar puncture with cytology was negative for malignancy. Together with the multiple melanocytic nevi, these central nervous system (CNS) lesions are consistent with neurocutaneous melanosis (NCM). The patient demonstrated no focal neurologic deficits in infancy and was discharged at 9 days of life. The patient is currently meeting developmental milestones for age, but he developed global hypertonia by 4 months of life. He is being followed on an outpatient basis by paediatric neurology and paediatric dermatology, and he is now 18 months old and meeting developmental milestones for age.

Figure 1

Clinical findings on our patient, anterior view.

Figure 2

T1-weighted precontrast MRI of the brain demonstrates nodules in bilateral hippocampal formations (A) and left cerebellum (B). T1-weighted precontrast MRI of the spine demonstrates a hyperintense nodule at L2 (C).

NCM should be suspected when a patient presents with large congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN) or CMN with multiple satellite nevi. Large CMN are those over 40 cm2 in area. Large CMN having more satellite lesions are correlated with higher risk of NCM.1 NCM is diagnosed when there are lesions anywhere in the central nervous system. The diagnostic test of choice is MRI with gadolinium contrast of the brain and spine. Typical findings include hyperintense areas on the temporal lobes on T1-weighted imaging as well as leptomeningeal enhancement.2 Melanomas can also be visualised in the CNS. NCM has a poor prognosis and majority of the patients die within 3 years of birth.3 Therefore, a timely diagnosis is pertinent to ensure maximal quality of life in the remaining time.

Patient’s perspective

Sometimes, people at the park or at the playground interrupt our family time to ask us if he is contagious. I am working on making business cards explaining his diagnosis to hand out, so others can learn about him without me having to explain it to them. It is helpful to follow nevus groups on social media. Connecting with other families and hearing their experiences has helped a lot. Sometimes other people in the community with nevi see him and stop to talk to us. One of them told us, ‘He’s going to be special’ (statements by patient’s mother).

Learning points

  • MRI of both the brain and the spine are recommended for patients with large congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN) or CMN with satellite lesions.

  • CNS lesions can be found commonly in the mesial anterior temporal lobes, cerebellum and leptomeninges. Common clinical findings include seizures, hydrocephalus and lethargy.

  • Treatment is symptomatic and surgical resection of melanocytic nevi is not usually recommended.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr Ian J Butler for his assistance in preparing this manuscript. The authors would like to thank the patient and the patient’s family for allowing their information to be shared.

References

Footnotes

  • Contributors ABJ, JHL and YR summarised the case and researched appropriate background information. KIR reviewed and edited the revised versions of the submission, obtained consent from the patient’s family and photographed the patient.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Patient consent for publication Parental/guardian consent obtained.