Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Magnetic resonance features of sinonasal melanotic mucosal melanoma
  1. Cosimo Nardi1,
  2. Chiara Vignoli1,
  3. Margherita Vannucchi2 and
  4. Michele Pietragalla1
  1. 1 Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, Radiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, University of Florence – Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
  2. 2 Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Division of Pathological Anatomy, University of Florence – Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Michele Pietragalla, michelepietragalla{at}hotmail.it

Abstract

A 67-year-old man presented to ear, nose and throat department complaining of nasal congestion and recurrent epistaxis for 5 months. Nasal endoscopy revealed a pigmented polyp obstructing the right nasal cavity. MRI with contrast agent showed a right nasal cavity polypoid mass with hyper signal intensity (SI) both in non-enhanced T1-w and diffusion imaging, marked hypo SI in T2-w sequences and avidly contrast enhancement characterised by rapid wash-in without significant wash-out on dynamic perfusion imaging. Histological specimen showed epithelioid and spindle cells with focal intense pigmentations and immunohistochemical features compatible with primary melanotic sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNM). As melanotic SNM shows MRI pathognomonic high non-enhanced T1-w SI, this case underlines the crucial role of MRI not only in assessing the local tumour extension/recurrence but also in increasing the diagnostic confidence of detecting melanotic SNM. Thus, MRI should be always performed in case of clinical–endoscopic suspicion of SNM.

  • ear, nose and throat
  • nasal polyps
  • head and neck cancer
  • radiology
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors CN: paper’s structure and review. CV: data collection. MV: histological images. MP: paper’s structure and review.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.