You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Reminder of important clinical lesson
CASE REPORT
Measles in pregnancy
  1. Jassimran Bansal1 and
  2. Aisha Hameed2
  1. 1 Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2 Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jassimran Bansal, jassimran.bansal{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Measles is becoming more prevalent; it can be difficult to diagnose, with severe complications in pregnancy. We report a case of measles in a 27-year-old, parainfluenza virus type 2-infected woman who was 32 weeks pregnant. She presented with fever, tachycardia, sore throat and a pruritic rash. She never had the measles, mumps, rubella vaccine. Serology showed raised inflammatory markers with lymphopoenia. Throat swab showed parainfluenza virus. Chest radiography was normal. Despite appropriate antimicrobial therapy, she developed worsening respiratory failure requiring premature delivery via caesarean section.

Postoperatively, she was transferred to a tertiary centre for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. She was decannulated and made a full recovery. Meanwhile, her husband was diagnosed with measles. She was then tested and measles was confirmed. The baby did not develop congenital measles.

This case emphasises the importance of vaccine histories at booking of pregnancy and early multidisciplinary team input to facilitate delivery in rapidly deteriorating pregnant women.

  • obstetrics and gynaecology
  • pregnancy
  • infections
  • TB and other respiratory infections
  • vaccination/immunisation

https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2018-228781

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors JB and AH were both heavily involved in the clinical care of the patient. JB wrote the case report. AH planned, helped structure and edited the case report and directed the discussion.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Patient consent for publication Obtained.