Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Life-saving emergency clamshell thoracotomy with damage-control laparotomy
  1. Asif Masroor Farooqui1,
  2. Clare Cunningham1,
  3. Nick Morse2 and
  4. Onyekwelu Nzewi1
  1. 1 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
  2. 2 Emergency Department, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
  1. Correspondence to Asif Masroor Farooqui, asifmaham{at}


Clamshell thoracotomy for thoracic injuries is an uncommon emergency department procedure. The survival rates following emergency thoracotomy are very low at 9%–12% for penetrating trauma and 1%–2% for blunt trauma. We report an unusual case of survival after emergency department clamshell thoracotomy for penetrating thoracic trauma with cardiac tamponade in a 23-year-old man with multiple stab wounds on the chest and abdomen. The patient was awake and alert on arrival in the emergency department. Bilateral chest decompression by needle thoracostomy released air and blood. During subsequent chest drain insertion, the patient suddenly deteriorated and arrested. Clamshell thoracotomy was performed, and sinus rhythm restored before transfer to theatre. Following repair of the thoracic injuries, a midline laparotomy was performed as bleeding was suspected from the abdomen and a splenic injury repaired. The patient survived and has made a full recovery. This case demonstrates how clamshell thoracotomy can be a life-saving procedure.

  • trauma
  • cardiothoracic surgery

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Contributors AMF reviewed the literature, wrote and revised the paper. CC reviewed the literature, wrote and revised the paper with AMF. NM reviewed the paper. ON reviewed the paper.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.