Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
An 18-year-old man underwent hemicolectomy for carcinoma of the transverse colon. On the third postoperative day, the patient reported decreased vision in both eyes. The patient was a hypermetrope of +5.0 DS. On examination, his best corrected visual acuity was 1/60 in both eyes. Amslers grid showed metamorphopsia in both eyes. Anterior segment and pupillary reactions were normal. Fundus examination revealed multiple patches of retinal whitening resembling soft exudates over posterior pole with predominant peripapillary distribution (figure 1). Foveal reflex was dull. Based on the classical fundus picture he was diagnosed to have Purtscher’s like retinopathy. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) showed intraretinal oedema and mild subretinal fluid in macula of both eyes (figure 2 and figure 3). Intravenous steroids were advised but deferred after discussion with gastroenterologist due to risk of post hemicolectomy wound infection and poor systemic condition. Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) could not be done as patient was too debilitated. Patient was observed with periodic review. His vision gradually improved to 6/18 in both eyes.
Various causes of vision loss following non ophthalmic surgeries have been reported in literature. Postoperative vision loss can occur following cardiac and spine surgeries mainly due to ischaemic optic neuropathy.1 In this case the vision loss was due to Purtschers retinopathy following hemicolectomy for carcinoma colon which has not been reported. Purtscher’s retinopathy is a distinct clinical entity seen secondary to trauma specifically blunt thoracic and chest compression injuries. Similar fundus picture presenting due to non-traumatic aetiology is called Purtscher’s like retinopathy.2 Bilaterality is seen in 60% of cases. Purtscher like retinopathy is used to describe similar clinical picture in the absence of any trauma. It occurs secondary to various causes such as fat embolism, pancreatitis or following childbirth. Various theories are postulated regarding the pathogenesis of Purtscher’s retinopathy but it is typically a microangiopathy caused by aggregates of fat, leucocytes, complement activation or other mechanisms.3
Diagnosis is mainly clinical. FFA can be supportive and shows leakage from blood vessels in mild stages and occlusion of precapillary arterioles in late stages. We were unable to do an FFA due to his poor systemic profile.
OCT showed intraretinal hyper-reflectivity in areas corresponding to the flecken. Subretinal oedema and serous neurosensory detachment was present at the fovea.
Purtscher’s retinopathy occurring after hemi-colectomy has not been reported to the best of our knowledge. The probable mechanism may be due to fat emboli leading to precapillary arteriolar occlusion.
Prognosis of purtscher’s retinopathy is variable. Purtshers flecken has no prognostic value. Purtscher’s secondary to trauma and pancreatitis have a better visual prognosis. Treatment is variable. Some physicians just observe while others resort to intravenous steroids though not of proven benefit. Fortunately, our patient improved without steroids. Purtscher’s like retinopathy following non ophthalmic surgeries is not uncommon. High index of suspicion with prompt retinal evaluation will help in the diagnosis.
Physicians need to be aware of postoperative visual loss and its occurrence after non-ophthalmic surgeries.
Prompt referral to ophthalmologist and treatment may salvage vision.
Purtschers like retinopathy can occur after hemi-colectomy.
Contributors GRR: Manuscript writing, patient management. NS: Gastrosurgeon, Treating Physician. TM: Intellectual contribution. TAJ: Collection of Images.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Patient consent for publication Obtained.