Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Case report
Burkholderia cepacia complex infection complicating long-term urethral catheterisation
  1. Olayinka Ayodele Ogundipe1,
  2. Rebecca Claire Pearson1 and
  3. Amy Campbell2
  1. 1 Department of Medicine of the Elderly, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  2. 2 Department of Medicine of the Elderly, Borders General Hospital, Melrose, Scotland, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Amy Campbell; amy.campbell10{at}nhs.net

Abstract

This report describes a 79-year-old Caucasian man with a history of syringomyelia, paraplegia and a long-term urethral catheter, presenting with recurrent catheter-related or catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) and persistent delirium. On one occasion, urine cultured bacteria from the Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC). This organism is recognised as being a coloniser of fluid or aquatic settings. However, in certain circumstances (eg, immunosuppression, immunocompromise, multimorbidity), BCC has been recognised to cause infection, that is, rather than merely contamination or colonisation. In this unwell older patient, treatment of the BCC CAUTI was guided by antibiotic sensitivities and microbiology advice. The report incorporates a brief discussion of some relevant microbiological terminology, and refers to associations and commoner sites of BCC-related infection. The report concludes by exploring how three philosophical concepts (Occam’s razor, Hickam’s dictum and Crabtree’s bludgeon) proved relevant in supporting clinical decision-making in this case.

  • catheterisation / catheter care
  • delirium
  • geriatric medicine
  • urinary tract infections
  • infectious diseases

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors OAO conceived the idea and design of the article. OAO and RCP contributed to the preparation and review of the initial manuscript. AC contributed to the critical revision and editing of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.